1FIN by IndigoLearn - CA Foundation, Inter & Final

CAAccountancyLaw

3.3

Average

49 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 49 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's tests & practice, flexibility, study material. Many students highlight platform offers robust practice resources like mtps, rtps, sugg...

What students talk about most

Tests & Practice

The platform offers robust practice resources like MTPs, RTPs, and trend analysis that significantly...

Flexibility

The provision of timestamps and an app-based learning environment suggests good flexibility for stud...

Study Material

The platform provides excellent supplementary resources like MTPs, RTPs, and trend analysis. However...

Fees vs Value

For some students, the resources and teaching have provided significant value, leading to successful...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.5

Student achieved good results ('Got exact 186.7')

Students engage with specific accounting standards ('yes sir i think in AS 7 there is a para 35')

Structured content delivery (timestamps provided for chapters)

Teaching content includes terms/topics not in the syllabus ('We don't even know the term... that term isn't anywhere in the CA inter FM syllabus..')

Teaching/testing content outside official study material ('In law also there is a question where I think it is not in our study material sec 115 consequences 2 mark question')

Inaccurate conceptual explanations or solutions ('Who said to you! It is not contingent liabilities! ... you can't only book loss of current year..')

Teacher's Experience3.0

Implied success in guiding students to results ('Got exact 186.7')

General positive regard from students ('Congratulations, Sir!')

Detailed discussion of complex topics like AS 7 and internal reconstruction suggests subject matter expertise

Syllabus misalignment and incorrect explanations raise questions about up-to-date knowledge or practical application of experience

Study Material3.5

App provides excellent supplementary resources like MTP, RTP, suggested answers, and past year trend analysis ('Your app really helped, all the MTP, RTP, suggested answers are found in one place')

Students actively use and solve problems from the study material ('I solved that internal reconstruction question as per study material')

Core study material or teaching content is criticized for not aligning with the official syllabus ('that term isn't anywhere in the CA inter FM syllabus..')

Potential gaps or inaccuracies in the provided study material relative to the official syllabus ('it is not in our study material sec 115 consequences')

Teacher's material/explanation may contradict official modules ('You have to see the module!')

Doubt Support2.5

Students actively discuss specific problems and concepts, implying an environment where doubts can be raised ('yes sir i think in AS 7 there is a para 35')

No explicit mention of dedicated doubt support mechanisms

Fundamental disagreements with the teacher's explanations suggest a potential gap in resolving core conceptual doubts effectively

Tests & Practice4.0

Platform offers robust practice resources like MTPs, RTPs, suggested answers, and past year trend analysis ('Your app really helped, all the MTP, RTP, suggested answers are found in one place')

Effective preparation for exams leading to good results ('Got exact 186.7')

Concerns that some test questions might deviate from the official syllabus ('In law also there is a question where I think it is not in our study material sec 115 consequences')

Flexibility4.0

Provision of timestamps for chapters suggests organized and navigable content

App-based learning implies flexibility for students to access content on demand

Fees vs Value3.5

High value for money for students who achieve success and become CAs ('now I'm a CA')

Good results for some students indicate value ('Got exact 186.7')

Issues with syllabus alignment and teaching accuracy could diminish perceived value if students feel they are learning irrelevant or incorrect material

Teacher Personality3.5

Generally receives positive and respectful greetings from students ('Congratulations, Sir!', 'Great sir!!')

Students express well wishes for the team's growth ('My Best wishes and sincere prayers for prosperity and growth')

Direct challenges in negative comments ('Who said to you!') could imply a lack of openness to feedback or an overly authoritative stance

Top Strengths

1. Comprehensive practice resources (MTP, RTP, trend analysis)

2. Structured content delivery and app-based flexibility

3. Positive student outcomes for some, including achieving CA qualification

Areas to Improve

1. Syllabus alignment and relevance of core teaching content

2. Accuracy of conceptual explanations and solutions

3. Effectiveness of doubt resolution and openness to feedback

What students love

“Got exact 186.7 🙏”

7 likes

“Congratulations, 1FIN and Avinash Group of Institutions. Looking forward to the new courses.”

2 likes

“My Best wishes and sincere prayers for prosperity and growth for the team🎉”

2 likes

“Congratulations, Sir! 🎉”

1 likes

“Great sir!! Looking forward! All the best sir!!!”

1 likes

“yes sir i think in AS 7 there is a para 35 so it says that if total cost exceeds total construction cost then the loss is to be booked immediately and we shall reduce the loss already booked”

1 likes

“Congratulations Team !”

“Hello indigolearn, I'm not purchased any classes from you, but I have used your app from my inter, now I'm a CA. Your app really helped, all the MTP, RTP, suggested answers are found in one place. And that past year trend analysis of each subject helped me a lot. Please continue this, I don't know where to express my gratitude, so I'm reviewing here, tons of thank you from my heart❤❤”

“Good morning sir, I solved that internal reconstruction question as per study material. Capital reserve is 246000. Balance sheet total is 1800000. I have taken full amount to capital reduction for trade payable and for debentures 120000 and 36000 for interest. As per me this answer is correct.”

“Here are the timestamps for the respective chapters: Internal & External Reconstruction: (0:00-56:51) Introduction to Internal Reconstruction: (0:00-7:49) Journal Entries & Ledger Preparation for Reconstruction: (7:49-12:08) Balance Sheet After Reconstruction: (12:08-12:38) Example Problem - Internal Reconstruction: (12:38-32:16) Second Example Problem - Internal Reconstruction (Share Surrender): (34:12-46:40) Third Example Problem - Internal Reconstruction (Preference Share Conversion)”

What could be better

“We don't even know the term... that term isn't anywhere in the CA inter FM syllabus..”

21 likes

“In law also there is a question where I think it is not in our study material sec 115 consequences 2 mark question”

8 likes

“Who said to you! It is not contingent liabilities! You have to see the module! And also! In third MCQ it is 72 lakh but the most appropriate answer will be 76 lakh.. you can't only book loss of current year.. you have to make provision for future year also”

Had a class with 1FIN by IndigoLearn - CA Foundation, Inter & Final?