A PLUS LAW ACADEMY - Judiciary and ADA Prep

Law

3.0

Average

17 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 17 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, teacher personality, teaching quality. Many students highlight the academy's focus on 'judiciary and ada prep' i...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

The teacher is assumed to possess sufficient experience in competitive law exam preparation, as sugg...

Teacher Personality

The teacher is respected and approachable, but students' deep frustrations with career challenges su...

Teaching Quality

The teacher is perceived as informative, but there's an apparent need for more structured and compre...

Doubt Support

While students feel comfortable approaching the teacher with doubts, the sheer number of basic queri...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality3.0

Students find the teacher 'very informative'

Numerous student questions about syllabus and study material suggest potential gaps in initial comprehensive guidance

Teacher's Experience4.0

The academy's focus on 'Judiciary and ADA Prep' implies specialized expertise

Students address the teacher as 'Sir', indicating respect and perceived authority

No direct comments explicitly praising the teacher's experience

Study Material2.0

Students repeatedly ask for 'one lecture on the syllabus and study material', 'what is the study material for the objective paper?', and 'any update regarding the subjective paper syllabus?'

Questions about 'paper 1 for ADA HP' and 'objective or subjective' indicate a lack of clear material guidance.

Doubt Support3.0

Students feel comfortable asking a wide range of questions to 'Sir' about vacancies, eligibility, and exam details

The high volume of fundamental questions suggests that initial information or proactive doubt prevention might be insufficient

Broader career frustrations (experience, salary) are directed at the teacher, implying a need for more comprehensive support.

Tests & Practice2.5

No comments mention the provision or quality of tests, practice sessions, or mock exams

Questions about 'objective or subjective' papers suggest a need for clarity on exam patterns, which should be supported by practice.

Flexibility3.0

Fees vs Value2.5

One comment praises 'Great service to society as advocates', potentially implying a broader value perception of the legal profession or academy's mission.

Strong complaints about low job salaries ('Is there any job for 28,000 per month?') and eligibility requirements ('where will we get 5 years of experience?') indirectly question the practical value of the preparation.

Frustration about being 'stuck in this job trap' reflects dissatisfaction with career outcomes.

Teacher Personality3.5

Students address the teacher respectfully as 'Sir'

Students feel comfortable and confident enough to ask numerous questions, indicating approachability.

The teacher is the recipient of significant student frustration regarding systemic issues and job market realities, suggesting a need for more empathetic or realistic guidance on these difficult topics.

Top Strengths

1. Teacher is perceived as informative

2. Students feel comfortable approaching the teacher with questions

3. Implied expertise in competitive law exam preparation

Areas to Improve

1. Provide clearer and more comprehensive guidance on syllabus and study materials

2. Address realistic job market challenges, eligibility criteria (e.g., experience), and salary expectations more proactively

3. Enhance provision and communication regarding tests, practice materials, and exam pattern specifics

What students love

“Great service to society as advocates. Better than HAS.”

4 likes

“Very informative.”

1 likes

“Sir, are there any chances for the ADA vacancy this year?”

1 likes

“Sir, one lecture on the syllabus and study material.”

1 likes

“Sir, paper 1 for ADA HP, do we prepare the same syllabus?”

“Sir, what is the study material for the objective paper?”

“Sir, any update regarding the subjective paper syllabus?”

“Objective or subjective?”

“Sir, 5 year experience compulsory hai?”

1 likes

“Hindi law ki kya qualification hai?”

1 likes

What could be better

“Now, where will we get 5 years of experience?”

2 likes

“Is there any job for 28,000 per month? Have some consideration for lawyers.”

1 likes

“Now we have to go for an appeal. The same reply will come. Then people don't think about appealing further. Should we appeal or look for a job?”

1 likes

“Sir, these are all tactics to avoid work. Our system is in a helpless state. We are all stuck in this job trap because our education system teaches us nothing for 15-20 years.”

1 likes

“Ab 5 saal ka experience kaha se lekar ayenge?”

2 likes

“28000 per month ki bhi koi nokri hoti hai kuch to khayal karo wakilon ka.”

1 likes

“Ab appeal main jana parega.. Tab bhi yahi reply aayega.. Fir agge appeal krne ki aadami sochta nahi hai.. Appeal kre ki naukri dhoonde.”

1 likes

Had a class with A PLUS LAW ACADEMY - Judiciary and ADA Prep?