AAKHRI ATTEMPT

1.9

Bad

29 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 29 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, teacher's experience, study material. AAKHRI ATTEMPT receives overwhelmingly negative feedback for lacking in-depth tea...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

There are no student comments, positive or negative, regarding the teacher's provision or quality of...

Teacher's Experience

No direct comments address the teacher's experience, but the reported issues with teaching depth and...

Study Material

The teacher fails to provide promised MCQ solutions, indicating a gap in the supplementary study mat...

Tests & Practice

Students note the absence of promised MCQ solutions, and there's an implied concern regarding the ex...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality1.0

Lack of in-depth teaching, focusing only on exam clearing rather than comprehensive knowledge (12 likes)

Excessive writing in class with insufficient actual teaching (8 likes)

Teacher's Experience2.0

Implied lack of pedagogical depth given the focus on exam clearing over comprehensive knowledge (12 likes)

Study Material2.0

Unfulfilled promise of separate MCQ solutions, despite being mentioned on the website (9 likes)

Doubt Support3.0

Tests & Practice2.0

Absence of promised MCQ solutions for practice (9 likes)

Student inquiry about the number of questions solved in class suggests potential concern about practice opportunities (6 likes)

Flexibility1.0

Misleading information about total course hours (226 actual vs. 190 advertised) (9 likes)

Inflexible teaching style that makes students write a lot while teaching less (8 likes)

Fees vs Value1.0

Student regret over taking classes due to teaching methodology (8 likes)

Misleading information about course duration and content (9 likes)

Lack of in-depth knowledge transfer, questioning the value beyond just clearing exams (12 likes)

Teacher Personality2.0

Misleading information about course details could reflect negatively on transparency and integrity (9 likes)

Student regret and dissatisfaction indirectly suggest a lack of student-centric approach (8 likes)

Top Strengths

1. None evident from student comments

Areas to Improve

1. Enhance depth of teaching and focus on comprehensive knowledge transfer

2. Improve transparency and accuracy in course details and promised content

3. Revamp teaching methodology to prioritize direct instruction over excessive writing

What students love

“Keep it up, bro! For sharing the reviews.”

3 likes

“Thank you, bro, for such an honest review.”

3 likes

“Appreciate the review.”

3 likes

“Thanks for the video.”

1 likes

“CA Chiranjeev Jain Sir's teaching style is so practical and exam-oriented. I gained so much confidence in my preparation after attending his classes. I highly recommend him for CA Final FR.”

“Bro, why you look so cooked? Cleared your CA, have some fun, bro, like a self-growth kinda thing.”

“Bro, you look cooked... try taking appropriate breaks while studying.”

9 likes

“This comment is positive in its intent to help the reviewer, suggesting self-care.”

9 likes

“This comment is positive in its intent to help the reviewer, suggesting self-care.”

“How many questions from the question bank does he solve in class? Approximately, if a chapter has 10 questions, how many does sir solve in class?”

6 likes

What could be better

“It's important to have a good understanding of the subject. Other teachers teach in depth because we have to become CAs. Knowledge is everything; if just clearing the exam is the goal, what will we do after we become CA?”

12 likes

“Please recheck. Total hours are 226 hours. Though he mentioned 190 hours on his website, actual hours are 226 hours. Further, he also mentioned on his website that he will solve MCQs, but there is no separate MCQ solution.”

9 likes

“Brother, in his class, he makes us write a lot and teaches less. I am regretting taking classes from him.”

8 likes

Had a class with AAKHRI ATTEMPT?