Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
ABCD classes

ABCD classes

Board ExamsEnglish
1.9
Bad

41 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 41 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, doubt support, flexibility. The teacher faces severe criticism for providing allegedly fake board exam question ...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

There are no comments available to assess the teacher's experience, qualifications, or tenure in the...

Doubt Support

No information is available in the comments regarding the teacher's doubt support, responsiveness, o...

Flexibility

There are no comments available to evaluate the teacher's flexibility in terms of scheduling, class ...

Teaching Quality

While some students express general gratitude, there are no specific comments on the teacher's teach...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
No specific praise for teaching methodology.
Effectiveness is undermined by the controversy over study material.
Teacher's Experience2.5
Study Material1.0
Some students initially expressed gratitude, possibly hoping the material was useful.
Numerous direct accusations of 'Fake questions paper', 'Fake', 'Completely fake', 'not real question papers'.
Skeptical questions like 'will this really come in the exam?' and 'real question?'
Doubt Support2.5
Tests & Practice1.0
The 'fake questions paper' comments directly relate to the quality and authenticity of any practice tests or materials provided.
Flexibility2.5
Fees vs Value1.5
The value proposition is severely compromised by the alleged fake study material, making any associated fees likely not worth it.
Teacher Personality2.0
Some polite 'thank you's and 'Ma'am, I am so happy' suggest a potentially pleasant demeanor or initial positive interaction.
The strong negative comment 'MC OF THE YEAR' indicates significant student frustration and anger, likely stemming from perceived deception.

Top Strengths

1. Initial ability to build student rapport

2. Capacity to generate hope and anticipation for exam success

3. Effective at attracting initial student interest

Areas to Improve

1. Authenticity and reliability of study material and exam predictions

2. Transparency with students regarding the nature of provided resources

3. Rebuilding student trust and managing expectations ethically

What students love

“Thank you so much ma'am.”

5 likes

“Thank you so much.”

4 likes

“Thank you ma'am.”

2 likes

“Thank you.”

5 likes

“Ma'am, I am so happy.”

5 likes

“Thank you so much ma'am.”

2 likes

“Thank you ma'am.”

2 likes

“Didi, will this really come in the exam? If it does, thank you in advance, ma'am.”

“Mam, real question.”

1 likes

“Mam, really?”

1 likes

What could be better

“Fake questions paper.”

2 likes

“Fake.”

2 likes

“MC OF THE YEAR.”

2 likes

“I've been watching this for a long time, it's completely fake. You can't fool people like this.”

1 likes

“These are all fake questions.”

1 likes

“This is also false.”

1 likes

“Completely fake.”

1 likes

“Sorry Didi, these are not real question papers.”

1 likes

Had a class with ABCD classes?