ANSS ACADEMY
16 comments
Review summary
Based on 16 comments, created with AI
Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, study material. The teacher is perceived as an unreliable source of information, failing to pr...
What students talk about most
Evaluation breakdown
Top Strengths
1. None identified from comments regarding teaching or reliable information.
Areas to Improve
1. Accuracy and reliability of information provided.
2. Transparency and honesty in communication.
3. Focus on actual educational content rather than unverified news.
What students love
“Hope so your words are true, my social elective exam went bad.”
“Sir, is it true that no one will fail this time? Please let me know.”
“Sir, will grace marks be given for the social science exam and general science? Please give marks.”
“Sir, I will get 7 in Social Science theory and 6 in Maths theory. Will I get grace marks? Please tell me.”
2 likes
“Tomorrow the education minister said the result will be given.”
“Social science detective, it went bad, only 14 correct. Will it be cut from this? (MCQ 36 correct)”
1 likes
“First comment, please pin it.”
2 likes
“Good news.”
“Sir, please tell me if grace marks are given after rechecking.”
“I hope your information is correct.”
What could be better
“They don't give results. Why do they keep giving fake news?”
3 likes
“Why do they make fake news?”
3 likes
“Where did this come from? Fake news is a bit late, they won't get views like this. Report it.”
“They don't give any results.”
“It's fake, the education minister said there will be no result tomorrow.”
“What's wrong with you guys, are you crazy? Why do you keep making up news like this?”
“This channel always provides misleading information.”
“They are just spreading rumors.”
“The information provided is unreliable and causes confusion.”