Bankers Byte

BankingUPSCQuantitative Aptitude

4.1

Great

15 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 15 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's tests & practice, teacher personality, teaching quality. Many students highlight teacher actively conducts live mock attempts, which s...

What students talk about most

Tests & Practice

This is a strong area, with the teacher actively engaging in and demonstrating live mock attempts. S...

Teacher Personality

The teacher exhibits an approachable and supportive personality, fostering a comfortable environment...

Teaching Quality

The teacher's videos are highly effective and contribute to students achieving good scores. However,...

Teacher's Experience

Students perceive the teacher as experienced and knowledgeable, frequently seeking strategic advice ...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.0

Videos have really helped students a lot

Students report achieving high marks (e.g., 90.75, 89.75)

Teacher is perceived to handle situations well

Verbal calculation is relatively poor, leading to more time taken for basic DI and simplification questions

Teacher's Experience4.0

Students seek strategic advice on exam preparation (e.g., mock difficulty levels)

Students share exam experiences and ask for guidance on mains chances, indicating trust in expertise

Student comment 'observing you for a very long time' suggests a sustained presence

The verbal calculation issue could subtly question the teacher's mastery of fundamental speed techniques expected from an experienced quant instructor

Study Material3.5

Teacher's videos are highly effective and helpful

Students show interest in the platforms or resources the teacher uses for mocks

No explicit mention of proprietary study materials like notes, books, or curated question banks beyond the teacher's videos and live mocks

Doubt Support3.5

Students feel comfortable asking for strategic advice on exam preparation

Students share personal exam experiences and seek guidance on potential outcomes

No explicit mention of formal doubt-solving sessions, dedicated Q&A platforms, or specific mechanisms for doubt resolution

Tests & Practice4.5

Teacher actively conducts live mock attempts, which students find beneficial

Students explicitly request the teacher to take more specific live mocks

Students are interested in emulating the teacher's method of recording live mocks

The teacher's verbal calculation speed could hinder the demonstration of optimal mock-taking efficiency

Flexibility3.0

A student requested the teacher to take a specific live mock, suggesting openness to student input

Limited evidence to fully assess the teacher's flexibility in adapting to student needs or curriculum changes

Fees vs Value4.0

Students explicitly state 'Your videos have really helped me a lot. Thank you,' indicating high perceived value

Students achieving high marks suggest a good return on investment (assuming a fee-based service)

No information regarding the actual fees or pricing structure is available in the comments

Teacher Personality4.2

Students use informal and friendly language ('bro,' 'Sir'), indicating an approachable demeanor

Teacher is praised for handling situations well ('You handled it well, bro. Keep it up!')

Students feel comfortable sharing personal exam experiences and asking for advice

The direct and critical nature of the negative feedback, though constructive, suggests a personality that might be perceived as needing to address specific performance aspects

Top Strengths

1. Tests & Practice (Engaging live mock attempts)

2. Teacher Personality (Approachable and supportive)

3. Teaching Quality (Videos are highly helpful and effective)

Areas to Improve

1. Verbal Calculation Speed (To enhance efficiency in problem-solving)

2. Formal Doubt Support (To provide structured assistance for student queries)

3. Breadth of Study Material (To offer more diverse proprietary resources)

What students love

“Sir, Oliveboard has a live mock until April 7th, 7 PM. Please take that too so I can understand my performance improvement. Your videos have really helped me a lot. Thank you.”

“You handled it well, bro. Keep it up!”

“My 13th slot at 4:30 PM had slightly difficult quant, especially arithmetic, compared to other slots. I attempted 93 questions in total. From Mumbai division, any chance for mains after normalization?”

1 likes

“90.75 marks”

1 likes

“75 marks obtained”

1 likes

“I managed English and Quant, but instead of the next section, the complete paper was submitted, so I couldn't attempt Reasoning.”

1 likes

“Bro, can you tell me which software you use to record your mock with face cam and audio? I’m planning to post my live mock attempt too.”

“89.75/100. Made a silly mistake in English.”

“Sir, should we practice exact exam level mocks or difficult level mocks in the last 3 to 4 days? Please reply.”

“Which platform was this?”

What could be better

“Bro, I am observing you for a very long time and I can say your verbal calculation is relatively poor. That's why it is taking more time to solve basic data interpretation and simplification questions.”

“Kindly practice verbal calculation and tables up to 20. Practice verbal calculation at home without pen and paper. Come back after 7 days; you will find yourself a different person in terms of mock performance.”

Had a class with Bankers Byte?