Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Bihar Exams Wallah

Bihar Exams Wallah

Science
2.5
Poor

24 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 24 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, flexibility, teaching quality. Many students highlight a student sought direct advice from the teacher regarding exam c...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

One instance shows a student seeking personal advice, suggesting some level of approachability. Howe...

Flexibility

There is a minor indication that the teacher might be open to student requests for specific content ...

Teaching Quality

While some students appreciate the teaching and find it helpful, there are significant and specific ...

Study Material

Despite requests for more content, there are serious concerns about the accuracy, completeness, and ...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
Students find the teaching 'very helpful' and 'terrific level'.
Some students feel confident for exams after attending classes.
Accusations of incorrect answers and content omissions (e.g., chlorophyll a/b).
Strong criticism regarding the teacher's level of understanding and teaching quality.
Claims that the teacher fakes answers from Google and makes mistakes in exams.
Teacher's Experience1.0
Students question the teacher's real-world success and competence, suggesting they should not be teaching.
Accusations that the teacher would fail in an actual exam scenario.
Study Material2.0
Students request more content like 'marathons', implying some value in existing material.
Specific complaints about content omissions (e.g., chlorophyll a/b).
Accusations that the material contains incorrect information and that answers are faked from Google.
Doubt Support3.0
A student sought direct advice from the teacher regarding exam cutoffs, indicating perceived accessibility.
No explicit comments on formal doubt support, but general issues with accuracy could undermine trust in support.
Tests & Practice2.0
Students request 'marathon' sessions, which often involve practice, indicating a desire for more practice opportunities.
A student corrected the teacher's answer to a question, implying inaccuracies in practice solutions.
Strong claims that questions taught do not appear in actual exams and that the teacher would make mistakes in an exam.
Flexibility3.0
A student requested a 'marathon' session, suggesting the teacher might be open to adapting content or format.
Fees vs Value1.0
Some general 'thank you' and 'helpful' comments could imply perceived value.
Direct accusations that teachers 'just sell courses and eat up money from lakhs of students'.
General sentiment that 'all masters are fake' and provide no real value.
Teacher Personality2.0
Some students use polite greetings and express gratitude, suggesting a generally approachable demeanor.
Harsh personal attacks questioning the teacher's competence and integrity.
Students express strong negative feelings, calling the teacher 'trash' and accusing them of 'ruining children'.

Top Strengths

1. General helpfulness and ability to build some student confidence.

2. Openness to student requests for specific content formats (e.g., marathons).

3. Perceived approachability for seeking advice.

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and completeness of teaching content and study material.

2. Relevance of taught content and practice questions to actual exams.

3. Addressing student concerns about commercialism and perceived lack of integrity.

What students love

Thank you mam.

2 likes

Marathon करवा दीजिए science का (Please conduct a science marathon).

1 likes

Very helpful ma'am.

Good evening ma'am.

Science kare or (Do science and...)

Right answer is (D) of 38.

Thank you mam.

Kon ab nhi jayega paper drne (Who will not go to take the exam now?).

2 likes

Bhyankar level (Terrific level).

1 likes

Ma'am, please tell the cutoff tonight, otherwise I won't go for the exam. GS is scaring me, but I can score 100% in math and reasoning. It's up to you if I go.

What could be better

If the paper was easy to moderate, you would be in a job today, not teaching on PW.

1 likes

You masters just sell courses and eat up money from lakhs of students.

You never said in class that chlorophyll a/b is used.

She is looking and telling, and that too incorrectly. Question 38's assertion and reason are both correct and explain each other, so option D.

You won't be able to do it; you people will ruin the children. Why don't you say you should do other work?

Easy to moderate - shows your level of understanding, your level of teaching. Such trash teachers on YouTube.

You won't get a single GK question right, Ma'am, nor will any other master.

Everyone is just faking answers from Google here. We won't study from any master now; we will work hard ourselves. All masters are fake.

You won't be able to do it in the exam, Ma'am. 100% you will make mistakes. I know not a single question came from YouTube teachers.

Had a class with Bihar Exams Wallah?