Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
CA Rishabh Baid

CA Rishabh Baid

CAAudit
4.2
Great

30 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 30 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's fees vs value, study material, flexibility. Many students highlight content is 'more than enough to clear set c' and leads to high sco...

What students talk about most

Fees vs Value

The value proposition is exceptional, as students consistently achieve outstanding results and clear...

Study Material

The study materials, including notes and videos, are highly effective and comprehensive, consistentl...

Flexibility

The teacher's content is remarkably concise and efficient, allowing students to achieve high scores ...

Teaching Quality

While many students achieve exceptional scores directly due to his teaching, indicating high effecti...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.0
Teaching method is described as 'just awesome'.
Lectures are 'truly beneficial', leading to high scores (e.g., 83, 76, 75, 81, 87).
Students successfully cleared exams by 'only watching your lectures'.
Teacher is 'very confused about foreign arbitration and international arbitration', using them interchangeably.
Concept clarity is criticized as 'not good'; teacher 'just read the notes and translate'.
Videos are described as 'boring' and 'nothing new'.
Teacher's Experience3.5
Students consistently achieve very high marks (e.g., 83, 70, 76, 68, 75, 81, 87), suggesting strong subject knowledge for exam preparation.
Teacher is 'very confused about foreign arbitration and international arbitration', indicating a lack of precision in certain complex topics.
Study Material4.5
Notes are 'good' and content is 'more than enough to clear Set C'.
Students scored high marks (e.g., 70, 63, 87, 77) by just referring to notes and videos.
Materials are sufficient on their own for exam success.
No direct cons about the material itself, though one comment implies the teacher 'reads the notes' which is a delivery issue.
Doubt Support3.0
Tests & Practice3.0
Flexibility4.5
Achieved high scores (e.g., 68, 63, 77) with 'only 4 hours of lectures' or 'just your 4 videos'.
Lectures are concise and highly efficient, allowing for quick learning.
Fees vs Value5.0
Content is 'more than enough to clear Set C' and leads to high scores (e.g., 83, 76, 68, 75, 81, 87) with minimal input.
Students cleared exams by 'only watching your lectures' or 'just by seeing your 4 lectures and going through your notes', indicating exceptional return on investment.
Teacher Personality3.5
Students express strong gratitude ('Thank you so much sir') and some use informal, appreciative language ('Thank you, bro'), suggesting approachability.
Videos are described as 'boring' and 'nothing new', indicating a lack of engaging delivery or dynamism.

Top Strengths

1. Exceptional effectiveness in helping students achieve high exam scores.

2. Highly concise and efficient lectures, maximizing student time.

3. Comprehensive and sufficient study materials (notes and videos).

Areas to Improve

1. Enhance conceptual clarity and precision, especially in complex topics.

2. Improve lecture engagement and dynamism to avoid monotony.

3. Potentially provide more clarity or support for doubts (based on lack of data).

What students love

“Thank you so much sir, I got 83 just by referring your videos and notes. Your teaching method is just awesome. The content provided is more than enough to clear Set C.”

3 likes

“Scored 70 marks. Thank you for your notes.”

3 likes

“Thanks, I have scored 76 just because of you and watched your videos only.”

2 likes

“Thank you, got 68 with only 4 hours of lectures, legit.”

2 likes

“Thank you for your lectures. I scored 75 marks with your help.”

2 likes

“Sir, I scored 81 marks today. Your lectures were truly beneficial. Thank you so much, Sir!”

1 likes

“Got 63 with just your 4 videos and notes. Thank you, bro.”

1 likes

“Thank you so much sir. Got 87 in SPOM Set C by just going through your videos and notes.”

1 likes

“Thank you for your lectures. Only watched your lectures and I have cleared my Set C with 67 marks.”

1 likes

“Thanks Rishab. I scored 77 in Set C just by seeing your 4 lectures and going through your notes.”

What could be better

“You yourself are very confused about foreign arbitration and international arbitration, at least 10 times. You have used them interchangeably, especially while stating conditions in section 44.”

2 likes

“Notes are good but concept clarity is not good; you just read the notes and translate.”

2 likes

“Same boring video... nothing new.”

1 likes

Had a class with CA Rishabh Baid?