CA Suraj Lakhotia

CAAccountancy

2.4

Poor

26 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 26 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, teacher's experience, teacher personality. Many students highlight students feel comfortable asking specific, detailed ...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

Students demonstrate comfort in approaching the teacher with intricate doubts about problem-solving,...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher appears to possess significant experience in the field, evidenced by the use of historic...

Teacher Personality

The teacher appears approachable, as students comfortably ask questions and use respectful address. ...

Teaching Quality

While no direct complaints about core teaching, the significant demand for comprehensive revision vi...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.5

Students explicitly state they 'won't pay attention to your teaching' unless comprehensive revision videos are provided.

Implied lack of crucial supplementary content (revision videos) impacting overall teaching package.

Teacher's Experience3.0

The teacher's use of a compiler spanning from 1982 suggests extensive experience and long-term involvement with the subject matter.

A student's direct question about the relevance of this long-standing compiler raises concerns about the up-to-dateness of the teaching approach or materials.

Study Material2.0

The teacher uses a 'compiler' of past questions, which is a valuable resource for exam preparation.

A student directly questions the relevance of the compiler (1982 to now), indicating a significant concern about the material's currency and applicability to current exam patterns.

Doubt Support3.5

Students feel comfortable asking specific, detailed questions about complex problem-solving scenarios in FM and Consolidation, implying an accessible channel for doubt resolution.

The comments only show students asking questions, with no feedback on the quality, timeliness, or effectiveness of the teacher's responses to these doubts.

Tests & Practice2.5

Students are clearly engaged in self-assessment and problem-solving, discussing their exam performance and mistakes, which implies a focus on practice.

There is no explicit mention of structured tests, mock exams, or specific practice materials provided by the teacher, beyond the implied use of a compiler.

Flexibility1.5

Students express a clear desire for the teacher to adapt and provide revision videos, indicating they believe such flexibility is possible.

The comments are strong requests for content that is currently missing, with students stating they 'won't pay attention' otherwise, highlighting a significant lack of current flexibility in adapting to student needs.

Fees vs Value1.5

Students explicitly state that they 'won't pay attention' and 'will only follow you when they get all FR revision in one place,' strongly implying that the current offering lacks sufficient value to attract or retain students.

Teacher Personality3.0

Students address the teacher respectfully as 'Sir' and feel comfortable posing specific questions, suggesting an approachable and non-intimidating demeanor.

There are no specific comments praising positive personality traits such as enthusiasm, clarity, or motivational skills, beyond basic approachability.

Top Strengths

1. Apparent approachability for doubt clarification

2. Indication of long-term experience in the subject

3. Use of a compiler for practice (though its relevance is questioned)

Areas to Improve

1. Develop and release comprehensive revision videos for FR to boost student engagement

2. Update or clearly demonstrate the relevance of study materials, especially the compiler

3. Enhance the overall value proposition to attract and retain students

What students love

“Sir, please come up with revision videos of all the FR chapters just like other teachers have done. This is the best time for it. In the next 20 days, you can daily drop a video and cover entire FR.”

“You will gain 1000x views compared to the current situation. Students will only follow you when they get all FR revision in one place.”

“Unless you upload all FR videos, students won't pay attention to your teaching. Students will only follow you when they get all FR revision in one place.”

“Sir, I am expecting 60+ in FM and Audit. Audit is my strong subject. I can score 60+.”

“It is better to focus on audit, give 300% on that. Relying on grace marks might lead to regret.”

“Sir, I solved it, but made a small mistake. If I hadn't made the mistake, I would have been proud.”

“Sir, 1982 to now, the compiler that you solved, is it still relevant?”

“Sir, in FM 1st question, I reduced S&D expenses of 12L from 90L assuming it as cost of sales. Is this approach wrong?”

“Sir, in consolidation, I did the whole sum, but I think the amounts are wrong in the working notes. How many marks can I get?”

“If ICAI is at fault, then 8 marks should be given. If it was another question, we would have attempted it.”

Had a class with CA Suraj Lakhotia?