CEE Video Channel
17 comments
Review summary
Based on 17 comments, created with AI
Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, study material. Many students highlight interesting discussion indeed., very robust and balanc...
What students talk about most
Evaluation breakdown
Top Strengths
1. Ability to facilitate engaging and thought-provoking discussions
2. High subject matter expertise in philosophy
3. Fostering robust and balanced critical thinking among students
Areas to Improve
1. Ensuring foundational concepts are clearly defined for all discussions
2. Addressing or clarifying serious personal accusations to maintain credibility
3. Potentially providing more structured guidance on complex distinctions
What students love
“Interesting discussion indeed. Thanks for posting.”
6 likes
“Yes, I enjoyed this. Very robust and balanced critique.”
3 likes
“Great stuff”
3 likes
“Great video Sir”
2 likes
“It is interesting to note that 100 years before WW1 it was common for the defeated to be massacred or sold as slaves leaving little ability for them to raise up again.”
1 likes
“The irony is, trying to be more progressive the victors of WW1 changed the German economic position, yet, could not change their philosophical outlook.”
1 likes
“And we then have WW2. The question is, was medieval treatment of the defeated, in the long term less violent?”
1 likes
“Yes people are more scientifically aware yet they are not aware of their religious ways 'baked into our human cake'.”
“A good example is a drug trial with a placebo. It works exactly because they believe it will. Because the belief in the authority (the doctors giving them the pill) is so strong.”
“The chicken sacrifice worked the same way. Put differently 'it was always in them'.”
What could be better
“Had she not been a Nazi herself, I could take this more seriously.”
“Define the difference between AI vs AGI. We're starting this discussion from the wrong basis.”