Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
CollegeDekho

CollegeDekho

CTET
1.1
Bad

9 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 9 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, teaching quality, teacher's experience. Many students highlight students address 'sir,' suggesting a point of hum...

What students talk about most

Teacher Personality

Comments do not provide specific feedback on the personality of any individual associated with Colle...

Teaching Quality

The provided comments offer no insight into the teaching quality of CollegeDekho, as they focus enti...

Teacher's Experience

The comments do not provide any information regarding the experience level of any educators or exper...

Study Material

There is no mention or evaluation of any study materials provided by CollegeDekho within the student...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality1.0
Teacher's Experience1.0
Study Material1.0
Doubt Support1.0
Students actively pose questions regarding exam scores, percentiles, and technical issues, indicating an expectation of support.
System messages like 'no event to display' and 'slot booking is not available' are confusing and unhelpful.
There's a lack of clear information on future phases, creating uncertainty and frustration.
Tests & Practice1.0
One student reported a good score (112.5), which could indirectly suggest effective preparation, though not explicitly linked to CollegeDekho's tests.
Flexibility1.0
Students face critical issues like 'slot closed' after registration without booking.
The 'slot booking is not available' message severely limits their ability to proceed.
Fees vs Value1.0
The potential requirement to pay registration fees again for a subsequent phase due to system errors is perceived as unfair and poor value.
Teacher Personality2.0
Students address 'Sir,' suggesting a point of human contact or a respectful tone in their queries.

Top Strengths

1. Platform for exam-related queries

2. Existence of a registration system (despite flaws)

3. Potential for score reporting/discussion

Areas to Improve

1. System functionality and clarity (e.g., 'slot closed', 'no event to display')

2. Information transparency and timeliness (e.g., phase 2 slot opening)

3. Fairness in fee policies (avoiding re-payment due to system errors)

What students love

Thanks! I was afraid because everyone said the percentile was down and the paper was easy. I got 112.5.

Hello sir!

I am scoring 68 marks in GUJCET 2026. What percentile can I expect?

For a score of 77.5 marks, what percentile can I expect? Was the GUJCET 2026 paper easier than 2025?

Sir, what month will phase 2 slot open?

I completed registration but didn't click on 'book slot'. Now it shows 'slot closed'. What does this mean? Will I be able to write this phase?

If I can't write this phase, for phase 2 will I need to pay the registration fee again?

It's showing 'no event to display'. What does this mean?

1 likes

It's showing 'slot booking is not available'.

1 likes

Sir, for me too, it's showing 'slot booking isn't available'.

What could be better

The system shows 'no event to display', which is confusing for users trying to find information.

The 'slot booking is not available' message is unhelpful and prevents students from proceeding with their applications.

The issue of 'slot closed' after registration without booking is a critical flaw that needs immediate attention.

Having to potentially pay registration fees again for phase 2 due to a system error is unfair to students.

The lack of clear information on when phase 2 slots will open creates uncertainty and frustration.

Had a class with CollegeDekho?