COMPETITIVE ODISHA

CTETMathematicsChemistry

4.3

Great

18 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 18 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, fees vs value, teacher personality. Many students highlight students repeatedly express gratitude and ask for series...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Students consistently praise the teacher's content and delivery, expressing strong satisfaction and ...

Fees vs Value

The explicit desire from a student to purchase a course is a strong indicator that the teacher's con...

Teacher Personality

Students frequently express gratitude and appreciation, highlighting a positive and respectful relat...

Teacher's Experience

While not explicitly stated, the breadth of subjects and exam types requested, coupled with positive...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality5.0

Students repeatedly express gratitude and ask for series continuation

A student wants to purchase the course, indicating high satisfaction

Series is described as 'good for CBZ'

Requests for more content 'like this' imply current content is excellent

Teacher's Experience4.0

Teacher is handling multiple subjects (CTET, Math, Chemistry) and exam types (OAVS, SSB TGT)

Students request specific, advanced practice materials like PYQs and chapter-wise MCQs, implying confidence in the teacher's expertise

Study Material4.0

Existing 'series' is well-received and considered 'good for CBZ'

Students are actively requesting more structured materials like chapter-wise MCQs and PYQs, indicating a demand for comprehensive resources

Requests for specific types of material (MCQs, PYQs) suggest potential gaps or a desire for more variety in current offerings

Doubt Support3.0

Tests & Practice4.0

Strong demand for practice-oriented content, including chapter-wise MCQs for math (2 likes)

Requests for PYQs for physics (1 like) and exam-specific questions for OAVS and SSB TGT

Students want the 'series' to continue, which likely includes practice elements

The numerous requests for specific practice materials suggest that current offerings might not fully meet student demand for variety or volume

Flexibility4.0

Students feel comfortable making specific requests for new subjects ('bring math and chemistry like this')

Requests for specific content formats (chapter-wise MCQs, PYQs) and scheduling ('on alternate days') indicate perceived openness to adaptation

Fees vs Value5.0

A student explicitly states 'I want to purchase the course' (1 like), indicating high perceived value

Teacher Personality5.0

Multiple 'Thank you so much, sir' and 'Thank you, sir' comments indicate a positive and appreciative student-teacher rapport

Top Strengths

1. Teaching Quality

2. Perceived Value (willingness to purchase)

3. Teacher-Student Rapport

Areas to Improve

1. Expand Practice Material (MCQs, PYQs, exam-specific)

2. Address Specific Subject Gaps (e.g., Physics PYQ, more Math/Chemistry)

3. Formalize Doubt Support (currently unaddressed in comments)

What students love

“Thank you so much, sir. Please continue this series.”

1 likes

“Thank you so much. Continue this series.”

“Thank you, sir. Please continue this series.”

“Thank you, sir.”

“I want to purchase the course.”

1 likes

“This series is good for CBZ.”

“Please bring math and chemistry like this.”

“Sir, please bring chapter-wise MCQ questions for math.”

2 likes

“Sir, please bring PYQ for physics.”

1 likes

“Sir, please bring questions for OAVS and SSB TGT on alternate days.”

Had a class with COMPETITIVE ODISHA?