CSIR NET Adda247

UGC NETScience

2.2

Poor

20 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 20 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, teacher's experience, doubt support. Many students highlight students use polite greetings ("good afternoon madam...

What students talk about most

Teacher Personality

Students address the teacher politely, indicating a respectful interaction, but there is no specific...

Teacher's Experience

Student comments do not offer any insights into the teacher's experience or subject matter expertise...

Doubt Support

Students frequently pose questions, indicating a need for guidance and support, but the quality and ...

Fees vs Value

No student feedback is provided regarding the perceived value for money or the cost of the course.

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

Students are requesting specific lectures and videos ("Ma'am, please bring lectures for this," "Ma'am, please make a video for Master in Life Science"), implying current offerings may be insufficient or not covering all desired topics.

Teacher's Experience2.5

Study Material2.0

Students are requesting specific lectures and videos, which could be interpreted as a need for more comprehensive or targeted study resources.

Doubt Support2.5

Students feel comfortable asking a wide range of questions ("When will the CSIR NET notification be released?", "Will they conduct the exam?", "Is there any change for life science?", "Can we apply for more than one post?", "Will the new syllabus not be implemented?", "Why and who should fill this form?").

The comments are questions, not acknowledgments of received support, so the effectiveness or responsiveness of doubt support is unknown.

Tests & Practice1.5

No comments mention tests, quizzes, or practice materials, suggesting this aspect is not highlighted by student feedback.

Flexibility2.0

Students feel comfortable requesting specific content ("Ma'am, please bring lectures for this," "Ma'am, please make a video..."), indicating an openness to student input.

The comments are requests for content, not praise for existing flexible options, suggesting a potential need for more adaptable or responsive offerings.

Fees vs Value2.5

Teacher Personality3.0

Students use polite greetings ("Good afternoon madam," "Hello mam," "Good morning ma'am"), suggesting a respectful and approachable interaction environment.

No specific comments praise personality traits like enthusiasm, patience, or clarity in communication.

Top Strengths

1. Student Engagement (students are actively asking questions and making requests)

2. Approachability (students feel comfortable addressing the teacher politely and asking questions)

3. Potential for responsiveness (students are vocal about their needs, creating an opportunity for the teacher to respond)

Areas to Improve

1. Providing comprehensive and proactive content/guidance (numerous requests for lectures, videos, and information on exam updates/syllabus)

2. Demonstrating teaching quality and effectiveness (no direct feedback on this aspect)

3. Clarity and accessibility of information (students frequently ask basic informational questions)

What students love

“Good afternoon madam. When will the CSIR NET notification be released? Any update?”

“Hello mam, I want to join class for upcoming June 2026. Please reply.”

“Ma'am, please bring lectures for this.”

“Good morning ma'am.”

“Mam, will they conduct the exam?”

2 likes

“Is there any change for life science?”

3 likes

“Ma'am, please make a video for Master in Life Science (Biotechnology) about which posts we can apply for and if we can apply for more than one post.”

“Mam, can we apply for more than one post?”

“Mam, will the new syllabus not be implemented for the June exam?”

“Mam, please tell us why and who should fill this form.”

Had a class with CSIR NET Adda247?