Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
e-Abhyasu

e-Abhyasu

Economics
2.3
Poor

11 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 11 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, teacher personality, teaching quality. Many students highlight one student expressed strong positive sentiment, ...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

No direct feedback on the teacher's experience level is provided in the comments, leading to a neutr...

Teacher Personality

While one student had a very positive personal connection, there is no widespread feedback on the te...

Teaching Quality

While one student found the explanations clear, a significant number expressed confusion, and a high...

Study Material

The study material appears to have accuracy issues, as evidenced by a highly-liked correction, and s...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
One student praised the explanation quality ('You explain everything very well').
Multiple students explicitly stated a lack of understanding ('Sir, I don't understand anything', 'Sir, I don't understand').
A significant error in an example was identified and highly liked by students, indicating issues with accuracy.
Teacher's Experience3.0
Study Material2.0
A highly-liked comment identified a significant numerical error in an example, indicating material inaccuracy.
Students requested additional content like preparation strategies, corporate preparation, and specific solutions, suggesting gaps in current offerings.
Doubt Support2.0
Repeated comments indicating a lack of understanding suggest that student doubts are not being effectively addressed or prevented.
Tests & Practice2.0
Students inquired about the availability of paper sets and test formats, indicating a potential lack of clear or sufficient practice materials.
Flexibility2.0
Students requested content in English medium and specific topics like corporate preparation and general strategies, suggesting a need for more adaptable offerings.
Fees vs Value2.0
The prevalence of negative feedback regarding understanding and material accuracy suggests that students may not perceive high value for any potential investment.
Teacher Personality3.0
One student expressed strong positive sentiment, calling the teacher 'the best sir' and thanking him.

Top Strengths

1. Student Engagement: Students are actively reviewing content and providing specific feedback, including corrections.

2. Positive Personal Connection: At least one student holds the teacher in high regard and expresses strong appreciation.

3. Content Provision: The teacher is providing content that prompts students to ask for more specific resources and strategies.

Areas to Improve

1. Clarity and Effectiveness of Explanations: Address the widespread student confusion and ensure concepts are easily understood.

2. Accuracy and Quality of Study Materials: Correct errors in examples and ensure all provided materials are reliable.

3. Breadth and Accessibility of Resources: Provide more diverse content (e.g., preparation strategies, corporate focus, English medium) and clearer access to practice materials.

What students love

You are the best sir, you explain everything very well. Thank you so much sir!

Sir, please make a video on preparation strategies.

1 likes

Sir, please give importance to corporate preparation.

1 likes

Krishna 3 solution.

1 likes

Sir, where is the paper set?

English medium.

Medam, salary rules have changed.

3 likes

This paper will be for 25 marks?

2 likes

In example 5, it should be ₹720 instead of ₹320, and accordingly, the final answer will be ₹1080.

10 likes

Medam, salary rules have changed.

3 likes

What could be better

Sir, I don't understand anything.

2 likes

Sir, I don't understand.

1 likes

Sir, I don't understand anything.

2 likes

Sir, I don't understand.

1 likes

Had a class with e-Abhyasu?