Engineers Career Institute

SSCRailway

2.5

Poor

27 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 27 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, flexibility, fees vs value. Many students highlight students feel comfortable asking questions, including administrativ...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

Students are willing to ask questions, suggesting an open channel for communication, but the comment...

Flexibility

There is no information in the provided comments to evaluate the teacher's flexibility regarding sch...

Fees vs Value

The comments do not provide any basis to evaluate the cost-effectiveness or perceived value of the c...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher covers complex subjects, indicating some exposure to the field, but students' direct cha...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

Engages students in discussions about specific technical questions relevant to exams.

Multiple direct accusations of providing wrong answers (e.g., water demand, modular ratio).

Students directly question the teacher's knowledge on specific topics (e.g., PCU values).

Teacher's Experience2.5

Covers a wide range of specific, technical topics pertinent to SSC/Railway exams (e.g., drip irrigation, load combinations, PCU values).

Students directly challenge the teacher's expertise and accuracy on specific technical points, implying gaps in reliable knowledge.

The presence of 'objectionable' questions suggests a lack of experience in crafting accurate and fair assessments.

Study Material2.0

Material appears to cover relevant exam topics, prompting student engagement and discussion.

Numerous complaints about wrong answers in answer keys (e.g., water demand, load combinations).

Reports of incorrect questions (e.g., modular ratio) indicate significant flaws in material accuracy.

Doubt Support3.0

Students feel comfortable asking questions, including administrative ones like eligibility criteria.

Comments about eligibility are requests for better and clearer explanations, implying current support is insufficient or not proactively provided.

Tests & Practice1.5

Practice questions are provided and actively discussed by students, covering relevant exam topics.

Numerous complaints about 'objectionable' questions and wrong answers in test keys.

Criticism regarding unfair scoring policies, specifically concerning negative marking for unattempted wrong questions.

Flexibility3.0

Fees vs Value3.0

Teacher Personality2.5

Students address the teacher respectfully ('sir') and engage in discussions.

Sarcastic comments from students ('You only found 2 wrong questions?') suggest the teacher might be dismissive or defensive about errors.

Some students perceive a lack of knowledge or competence ('The master himself doesn't know').

Top Strengths

1. Engages students in technical discussions on relevant exam topics.

2. Covers a broad range of specific competitive exam subjects.

3. Provides an environment where students feel comfortable asking questions.

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and reliability of teaching content and provided answers.

2. Quality and correctness of test questions and associated answer keys.

3. Transparency and responsiveness in addressing student feedback regarding errors and clarifications.

What students love

“Q80 also has a per capita answer of 110 for 20000.”

9 likes

“There's also a question about dead, live, and wind load combination, sir.”

3 likes

“Sir, the drip irrigation question... and the load combination one...?”

3 likes

“Focus on experience too. Diploma 2 years and B.Tech 1 year. Everyone quickly announces notifications but doesn't properly explain eligibility.”

3 likes

“Can final year students be eligible?”

3 likes

“1. Drip irrigation question, 2. Water demand for less than 20000 population, 3. DL + LL + EL combination, 4. PCU value of Autorickshaw, 5. Reciprocal leveling question, sir.”

2 likes

“For urban roads, auto rickshaw PCU is given as 1.2, as per Table 1 of IRC 106 1990.”

2 likes

“Q52 relative roughness only is the correct answer.”

1 likes

“The tube well question also, sir.”

1 likes

“Water demand per capita for population less than 20000.”

What could be better

“The answer for water demand is 110 lpcd, which is also wrong.”

3 likes

“Wrong question marks should be given to all, even if students did not attempt it because of negative marking.”

3 likes

“5 to 6 questions are objectionable, sir.”

2 likes

“The master himself doesn't know. 1 is for rural roads, 1.2 for urban. Generally, 1.2 is taken for safety.”

1 likes

“For DL+LL+EL, the correct value is 1.2, 1.2, 1.2, but the answer key gave a wrong answer.”

“The modular ratio of M30 without creep question is also wrong.”

“Keep looking, sir, you'll find more.”

“You only found 2 wrong questions?”

Had a class with Engineers Career Institute?