Fakhar STEM Sphere
81 comments
Review summary
Based on 81 comments, created with AI
Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, flexibility, teacher's experience. Many students highlight students express love and high regard for the teacher ...
What students talk about most
Evaluation breakdown
Top Strengths
1. Effective MCQ preparation
2. Ability to simplify complex topics
3. Supportive and well-liked personality
Areas to Improve
1. Comprehensive coverage and teaching for long questions
2. Quality and authenticity of practice tests (avoid AI-generated content)
3. Accuracy of solutions and explanations
What students love
“Alhamdulillah, all my MCQs are right. Thanks, sir! We are waiting for your physics class because you said when you conduct your class, physics will be easy like halwa.”
4 likes
“Thank you sir for supporting us. We all love you.”
2 likes
“Thanks sir, really helpful.”
2 likes
“20/20 Alhamdulilah.”
1 likes
“Sir, the whole paper came from the book, it's very easy.”
1 likes
“Thank you so much sir, you are the best.”
1 likes
“Sir, you are very good.”
1 likes
“Allah grant you success.”
1 likes
“Thank you so much dear sir, please cover all important short and long questions.”
“Yes sir, thank you for having a live session for chemistry.”
What could be better
“Dear All, I'm not satisfied with the long questions. The paper was very pathetic long-wise. Best of luck for the evening paper.”
12 likes
“It's cheating! Morning students got out-of-syllabus MCQs, and they didn't. Very sad.”
6 likes
“They clearly mentioned in the FRAMEWORK ASSESSMENT that they will not give MCQs from CIRCLE 6, but they gave 2 MCQs. That's unfair.”
4 likes
“Sir, don't you think evening students have more advantage because the Namaz long question was very easy and predictable in the morning paper? Morning students have disadvantages.”
1 likes
“Sir, you made one MCQ wrong. Its answer is 'Be Nayaz'. There is a mistake in that MCQ.”
“Sir, our paper was very bad, this is injustice to us.”
“This looks AI, please read the questions carefully, you will see imperfections.”
“Thanks for wasting our time. The paper has no version code, and you made it with AI. You knew it couldn't write words correctly. What language was used in between? One could use a better AI like Gemini or ChatGPT.”