Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Gagan Prajapati

Gagan Prajapati

RailwayGK
1.8
Bad

25 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 25 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, tests & practice, flexibility. Gagan Prajapati faces significant criticism regarding the accuracy of his advice and und...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

There is no information available in the provided comments to evaluate the teacher's doubt support.

Tests & Practice

The comments do not provide any insight into the quality or relevance of tests and practice material...

Flexibility

There is no information in the student comments to assess the teacher's flexibility.

Study Material

There are no specific comments about study material. However, the general criticism of the teacher's...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality1.0
Student questions the teacher's understanding of exam rules and re-typing policy, stating 'Why make videos if you don't understand things?'
Implied criticism that 'all teachers are fooling us' regarding WPM vs. total words, potentially including Gagan Prajapati.
Teacher's Experience1.0
A student directly challenges the teacher's expertise by asking 'Why make videos if you don't understand things?'
Study Material2.0
No direct comments on study material, but the criticism of the teacher's understanding could indirectly imply issues with the quality or accuracy of any provided guidance or materials.
Doubt Support2.5
No comments available regarding doubt support provided by the teacher.
Tests & Practice2.5
No comments available regarding tests or practice materials provided by the teacher.
Flexibility2.5
No comments available regarding the teacher's flexibility in teaching methods or scheduling.
Fees vs Value2.0
No direct comments on fees, but the criticism regarding misleading advice could imply poor value for any paid services.
Teacher Personality1.5
A student's critical tone ('Why make videos if you don't understand things?') suggests a lack of trust or respect for the teacher's credibility and judgment.

Top Strengths

1. No strengths identifiable from provided comments.

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and reliability of information/advice provided to students.

2. Demonstrating a deeper understanding of exam specifics and policies.

3. Building student trust and credibility.

What students love

My center provided every person with a new keyboard. Retyping should only happen at faulty centers.

Fair selection is very important; otherwise, there is no meaning to hard work and honesty after overcoming many challenges.

I typed 3200+ keystrokes in this test. This was my worst performance compared to my usual speed of 70-75 wpm, which I can easily get on any keyboard.

1851 keystrokes, 10 mistakes. No crying because I learned on a bad keyboard at home and still got 40+. It's good I didn't learn on a great keyboard. Full support to those whose test went badly.

A notice has been issued by RRB today: those who want to opt for a retyping test, a link will be provided soon. Those who do not want to go for retyping, their transcript will be evaluated.

Retyping is happening!

Retyping should happen.

Retyping should happen.

Retyping should happen.

Retyping should happen.

What could be better

I traveled 32 hours by bus for a 10-minute typing test, and all they provided was a shitty, outdated Lenovo keyboard that couldn’t even be pressed smoothly. The chaos made it my worst exam experience ever.

1 likes

What were you saying in the last video, that there would be no re-typing? What happened now? You have to complete 300 words somehow, keystrokes don't matter. It's too much. Why make videos if you don't understand things?

All the failed candidates got another chance, and this is totally unfair. Those with poor skills or who get nervous are crying for retyping. This is disgusting for real aspirants who performed well.

They are making a big fuss about getting 30 words per minute. When the typing instructions came, it said to complete 300 words, that's enough. All teachers are fooling us; 30 wpm means 300 words.

When they invalidated correct questions, nobody spoke up, which undeservedly pushed candidates forward. Everyone was silent then.

No retyping should happen. Next time, they'll get bad keyboards again, and the crying will start again. 7 out of 8 people fail typing, so these are just the ones crying. There was plenty of time to practice.

Had a class with Gagan Prajapati?