Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
GATE Wallah

GATE Wallah

GATEJEE
3.0
Average

70 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 70 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's study material, doubt support, teaching quality. Many students highlight students actively request new and specific content, such as v...

What students talk about most

Study Material

Students show interest in and request more specific content, suggesting they find the teacher's mate...

Doubt Support

The teacher is frequently approached for guidance on various student queries, suggesting a strong pe...

Teaching Quality

While one comment expresses general thanks, there's no specific feedback on the clarity, effectivene...

Teacher's Experience

Students perceive the teacher as experienced enough to offer guidance on various complex topics, yet...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality3.0
"Thanks sir" suggests some level of student satisfaction.
No specific details about teaching methods or clarity are provided in the comments.
Teacher's Experience3.0
Students frequently seek guidance on complex topics like CCMT, admissions, and interview prep, indicating a belief in the teacher's expertise.
A past instance of inaccurate cutoff predictions for NTPC raises concerns about the reliability and accuracy of the teacher's guidance.
Study Material3.5
Students actively request new and specific content, such as videos on CCMT, NIT/IIIT options, mid-tier NITs, and specific papers, implying value in the teacher's material or potential material.
No direct complaints about the quality or availability of existing study material.
Doubt Support3.5
Numerous requests for guidance on admissions, interview preparation, and specific papers indicate students view the teacher as a reliable source for addressing their doubts.
No specific negative feedback regarding the teacher's responsiveness or effectiveness in resolving doubts.
Tests & Practice3.0
Flexibility3.0
Students make specific requests for content on niche topics like aerospace, mid-tier NITs, and specific papers, implying an expectation of the teacher's adaptability.
No information on whether the teacher actually accommodates these requests.
Fees vs Value2.5
Students' continued requests for guidance and content could imply a perceived value in the teacher's offerings.
The severe disappointment from inaccurate predictions directly undermines the value, as it led to false hope and potentially misinformed decisions.
Teacher Personality2.5
Students address the teacher respectfully ("Sir") and express general appreciation ("Thanks sir").
The strong negative comment, "Don't do this, sir," conveys deep disappointment and a breach of trust due to past actions, affecting the perception of reliability.

Top Strengths

1. Perceived ability to provide guidance on complex topics

2. Responsiveness to student needs (implied by content requests)

3. General student appreciation for efforts

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and reliability of information/predictions

2. Specificity in teaching quality feedback (need more direct praise for teaching)

3. Transparency and communication regarding content scope and limitations

What students love

“Thanks sir.”

1 likes

“Sir, please release a new video on CCMT only for NIT Admissions.”

2 likes

“Need CCMT guidance.”

2 likes

“Sir, please guide in CCMT portal and kindly include aerospace too.”

1 likes

“Please sir, do make a video for just qualified people, which possible NITs or IIITs can be available.”

1 likes

“Yes sir, please guide.”

1 likes

“Sir, make videos on mid-tier NITs also, like Nagpur, Surat, Bhopal, etc.”

“Sir, please include DA paper.”

“Guide as much as possible.”

“Sir, interview preparation ke liye kya kare? (Sir, what should we do for interview preparation?)”

What could be better

“Don't do this, sir. You also released an expected cutoff for NTPC, and everyone knows what happened. We were hopeful.”

8 likes

Had a class with GATE Wallah?