HP Exams Institute
63 comments
Review summary
Based on 63 comments, created with AI
Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, teaching quality, teacher's experience. Many students highlight students express strong support and solidarity ('...
What students talk about most
Evaluation breakdown
Top Strengths
1. Teacher Personality (Advocacy, Empathy, Trust)
2. Doubt Support / Information Sharing
3. Study Material (High Demand for specialized books)
Areas to Improve
1. Availability and timely release of study materials (books)
2. Explicit feedback or testimonials on direct teaching quality and lecture effectiveness
3. Structured mock tests and practice sessions beyond PYQ resources
What students love
“Sir, can you tell me when the HRTC conductor recruitment will be seen or if it will happen this year? Please share some information.”
2 likes
“Good morning sir, this is our thought. No one is listening to us. Sir, our families have already spent so much money on our education, and now the examination fee has been increased to 800 Rs.”
1 likes
“This government job is good for the poor.”
1 likes
“Sir, when will the Sub Inspector recruitment come?”
1 likes
“Sir, what about your book? When will it be available?”
1 likes
“Sir, has your book on HPRCA All India GK and HP GK PYQ questions not been prepared yet?”
1 likes
“Sir, are +2 pass students also eligible to fill this form? Please reply.”
“We want transparency.”
“True sir, I am with you 100%.”
“Sir, your video should reach all aspirants in Himachal. This government has badly exploited all of us.”
What could be better
“11:30 people with 10-15 lakhs must have reached HPRCA, and through normalization, those who can't even read or write will clear the test.”
3 likes
“This youth neither spoke during the syllabus time nor during normalization. Now they will speak ashes. The scam has happened.”
2 likes
“What is this normalization system? It's nonsense. The old offline pattern was better. They are gambling with marks calculation.”
1 likes
“There is something wrong. When marks are not shown, how can anyone know on what basis normalization was done? This looks like fraud.”