IES-GATEWiz

SSC

2.8

Poor

95 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 95 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, teacher's experience, flexibility. Many students highlight students express strong gratitude and respect ('thank ...

What students talk about most

Teacher Personality

The teacher appears to have a positive and respected personality, fostering good relationships with ...

Teacher's Experience

Students acknowledge the teacher's long-standing presence and respect, suggesting a good level of ex...

Flexibility

There is no direct feedback in the comments to evaluate the teacher's flexibility regarding scheduli...

Teaching Quality

While some students find the teaching impressive and clear, significant concerns exist regarding the...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.5

Students find some explanations impressive and clear ('That was impressive', 'Thanks sir, here some teachers are making students object to all questions').

General appreciation for the teaching ('Thank you so much sir!', 'Thanks guru ji, you are the best!').

Concerns about factual accuracy ('Biochemical oxygen demand is called biological oxygen demand, or BOD is also given in brackets, which is common sense').

Disagreement with answers ('Sir, I do not agree with your answer').

Teacher's guidance leading to incorrect exam answers ('This question was marked wrong by SSC for me').

Technical flaws in presented examples/projects (structural stability, missing engineering elements).

Teacher's Experience3.5

Students acknowledge a long-standing presence ('It's good to see you after so many years sir....').

Referred to with respect as 'guru ji', implying deep knowledge and experience.

Technical inaccuracies and flaws in examples indirectly question the depth or currency of expertise.

Study Material2.0

Some content is found impressive and inspiring ('That was impressive', 'Nice to see coordinated work').

Significant concerns about safety protocols in presented projects ('Regarding safety, no one wore a helmet or jacket').

Doubts about structural stability and completeness of engineering details in examples ('not convinced about the structural stability', 'No waterproofing, no drainage, no abutments, sections resting loosely, no expansion joints').

Factual inaccuracies in definitions ('Biochemical oxygen demand is called biological oxygen demand').

Doubt Support2.5

General appreciation could imply good doubt support ('Thank you so much sir!').

Implied clarity in answers, reducing student objections ('Thanks sir, here some teachers are making students object to all questions').

Direct disagreement with a teacher's answer ('Sir, I do not agree with your answer') indicates unresolved or incorrect doubt resolution.

Tests & Practice2.0

Inspires students towards practical application and project completion ('We can do it. And We have to do it.', 'our train projects will be completed quickly').

A critical flaw is highlighted where the teacher's answers or guidance led to incorrect responses in the actual SSC exam ('This question was marked wrong by SSC for me').

Flexibility3.0

Fees vs Value2.5

Strong positive sentiment ('Thanks guru ji, you are the best!') could imply high perceived value by some students.

The numerous concerns about accuracy, safety, and incorrect exam answers could imply poor value if students are paying for potentially flawed information that negatively impacts their exam performance.

Teacher Personality4.5

Students express strong gratitude and respect ('Thank you so much sir!', 'Nice hard work sir!', 'Thanks guru ji, you are the best!').

Positive long-term relationships are evident ('It's good to see you after so many years sir....').

Top Strengths

1. Teacher Personality and Student Rapport

2. Ability to Inspire and Motivate for Projects

3. Perceived Experience and Long-standing Presence

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and Completeness of Technical Content

2. Relevance and Correctness of Answers for Exam Success

3. Safety and Engineering Detail in Examples/Demonstrations

What students love

“That was impressive. Pre-stressed concrete is strong.”

7 likes

“Thank you so much sir!”

6 likes

“No. of hours from the Start to Finish, please. Only 24 hours? Nice to see coordinated work. We can do it. And We have to do it.”

4 likes

“It's good to see you after so many years sir....”

3 likes

“Impressive!”

2 likes

“The work was completed in India, in 24 hours.”

1 likes

“Nice hard work sir!”

1 likes

“Thanks sir, here some teachers are making students object to all questions.”

1 likes

“Thanks guru ji, you are the best!”

1 likes

“This way, our train projects will be completed quickly.”

What could be better

“Regarding safety, no one wore a helmet or jacket. It's good that the country is progressing, but safety first because lives matter.”

13 likes

“I am not a civil engineer but somehow not convinced about the structural stability.”

11 likes

“Biochemical oxygen demand is called biological oxygen demand, or BOD is also given in brackets, which is common sense.”

9 likes

“Sir, I do not agree with your answer.”

4 likes

“I'm somewhat puzzled. No waterproofing, no drainage, no abutments, sections resting loosely, no expansion joints. Occupational safety wasn't a major concern.”

2 likes

“This question was marked wrong by SSC for me.”

1 likes

Had a class with IES-GATEWiz?