Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Jam Chem

Jam Chem

CTETUGC NETGATEChemistry
4.0
Great

123 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 123 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, study material, fees vs value. Many students highlight students consistently found exams easy to moderate, indicatin...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

The teacher's instruction effectively prepares students, making complex exams feel manageable and al...

Study Material

The study material is highly effective, closely following the syllabus and NCERT, which significantl...

Fees vs Value

The teacher provides significant value, as evidenced by students feeling well-prepared and finding e...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher demonstrates a strong understanding of exam patterns and levels, though there's a minor ...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.5
Students consistently found exams easy to moderate, indicating effective preparation.
Teaching covers the syllabus well, aligning with NCERT standards.
Prepares students effectively for both descriptive and numerical questions.
Made a mistake in the answer for a specific concept (ln K vs 1/T).
Teacher's Experience4.0
Demonstrates a strong understanding of exam patterns, leading to accurate cut-off predictions.
Effectively prepares students for PGT level exams.
Did not consistently provide sources for information presented in videos.
Study Material4.5
Material is well-aligned with the syllabus and NCERT, making exams feel easy to moderate.
A reported mistake in an answer could indicate an issue with solutions provided in the material.
Doubt Support3.5
No negative comments regarding doubt support, suggesting it is at least adequate.
No explicit positive comments or details about the quality or availability of doubt support.
Tests & Practice4.0
Effectively prepares students for good level numericals and overall exam difficulty.
None explicitly mentioned.
Flexibility3.5
No negative comments regarding flexibility, suggesting it is at least adequate.
No explicit positive comments or details about the teacher's flexibility.
Fees vs Value4.5
Students felt well-prepared for exams, indicating good return on investment for the education received.
None explicitly mentioned.
Teacher Personality3.5
Appears helpful, as evidenced by sharing question papers with students.
Lacks consistency in providing sources for information in videos, which can affect transparency.

Top Strengths

1. Effective Exam Preparation

2. Syllabus & NCERT Alignment

3. Strong Value for Money

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy of Solutions/Content

2. Transparency and Sourcing of Information

3. Explicit Communication on Doubt Support

What students love

“EMRS PGT descriptive was easy as compared to KVS.”

5 likes

“Paper moderate, not very easy but needs practice to solve numericals which are of good level. Can’t expect KVS to set easy paper like this.”

4 likes

“Paper was according to syllabus and easy!”

3 likes

“Objective easy, subjective moderate.”

2 likes

“Easy to moderate.”

2 likes

“Most accurate cut off, because paper was easy, and many students were from SSC background.”

1 likes

“Paper is very easy but unfortunately I cleared Tier 1 cut off but failed in Language Paper. I am currently working as PGT Chemistry, so this was very easy for me.”

1 likes

“Unfortunately, I was eliminated in preliminary for language. This is a very easy paper as per recruitment level, i.e., PGT.”

1 likes

“Paper is from NCERT and of easy to moderate level.”

“Very easy paper sir but I didn't qualify Tier 1, missed chance. Thank you sir for sharing question paper.”

What could be better

“You made a mistake in the answer for ln K vs 1/T.”

4 likes

“Sir, yesterday you also made a video on EMRS, but you didn't say where it came from. And today, it's the same thing.”

1 likes

Had a class with Jam Chem?