Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Kaivalya PCS

Kaivalya PCS

UPSCSSC
2.8
Poor

29 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 29 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, flexibility, teacher's experience. Many students highlight students express high trust ('i am in trusted hands, t...

What students talk about most

Teacher Personality

The teacher exhibits a positive, approachable, and trustworthy personality, fostering a good rapport...

Flexibility

Students' comfort in requesting specific types of sessions and content suggests that the teacher is ...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher shows some experience in identifying key topics and providing exam-specific strategies. ...

Doubt Support

There is no explicit feedback on the teacher's doubt support. While students engage with content, it...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
Students learned how to solve papers and approach statement-based questions.
Specific geography trick taught by the sir was useful in an exam.
Students didn't understand anything in the paper, implying insufficient teaching.
Criticism that the teacher only covers '10 slides' and lacks depth for competitive exams.
Teaching is perceived as superficial ('one-liners') and ineffective for complex papers.
Teacher's Experience3.0
Teacher identifies 'most focused topics' for exams, suggesting familiarity with exam patterns.
Ability to teach specific tricks that appear in exams indicates practical experience.
The perceived lack of depth in teaching and material indirectly questions the teacher's experience in preparing students for the full scope of high-level competitive exams.
Study Material2.0
Some specific content and focused topics are appreciated by students.
Tricks provided for subjects like geography are found to be directly applicable.
Material is criticized as '10 slides' and 'one-liners', indicating a lack of depth.
Students feel the material is insufficient for challenging questions and that 'nothing will come from these one-liners'.
Claims that questions came from the material are disputed, with students stating only common questions were covered.
Doubt Support3.0
One comment shows a student actively engaging with a specific question and providing an explanation, suggesting an environment where such discussions might be encouraged or facilitated.
There are no direct comments, positive or negative, specifically addressing the teacher's doubt support mechanism.
Tests & Practice3.0
Students learned how to solve papers and improved their approach to statement-based questions.
Students are critically engaging with test solutions, identifying errors in options.
The sentiment of 'didn't understand anything in the paper' suggests that the practice or preparation provided was insufficient for actual exam performance.
Flexibility3.5
Students feel comfortable requesting specific content like 'active recall sessions' and videos on 'most focused topics'.
This indicates a potential openness from the teacher to adapt to student needs and suggestions.
Fees vs Value1.5
Some students express trust and appreciation, implying perceived value for certain content.
Strong criticism that paid batches offer poor value, with students feeling 'self-study is the only way'.
The teaching is seen as superficial ('10 slides', 'one-liners') and not worth the investment for competitive exam preparation.
Teacher Personality4.0
Students express high trust ('I am in trusted hands, thank you brother').
Frequent 'Thank you sir' comments indicate general appreciation and a positive rapport.
The use of 'brother' suggests an approachable and friendly demeanor.

Top Strengths

1. Approachable and trustworthy personality

2. Ability to teach specific exam-solving tricks and strategies

3. Openness to student requests for specific content

Areas to Improve

1. Depth and comprehensiveness of study material for competitive exams

2. Overall teaching depth and coverage for high-stakes exams

3. Value proposition and effectiveness of paid courses/batches

What students love

“Sir please keep an active recall session on a current affairs topic.”

1 likes

“Sir, please make a video on the most focused topics for the 17th exam, like genetics and lakes, from which many questions were asked.”

1 likes

“Today I also learned how to solve papers. Now I feel statement-based questions are better.”

1 likes

“Easier than BPSC and UP PCS, I think..”

“I am in trusted hands, thank you brother.”

“In question no 11, I think... Yes, transpiration helps in increasing the osmotic pressure in roots. This promotes more absorption of water from the soil.”

“Thank you sir, I was waiting for this.”

“Thank you sir... first comment.”

“Thank you sir, the trick you taught for geography passes was the first question in the Aedo exam.”

“Question 80's solution is correct, the option is wrong.”

What could be better

“I didn't understand anything in the paper. This paper revealed the reality of all YouTube paid batch people. Self-study is the only way; on YouTube, they teach only 10 slides and think they are heroes.”

2 likes

“All institutes are saying questions came from them, but honestly, they didn't. The 10-15 normal questions are common; the rest were solved with one's own intellect.”

1 likes

“Nothing will come from these one-liners. The BPSC ADEO paper has shown this.”

Had a class with Kaivalya PCS?