kvsk physics
168 comments
Review summary
Based on 168 comments, created with AI
Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher personality, teacher's experience. Many students highlight exceptional clarity in concepts, amazing and effe...
What students talk about most
Evaluation breakdown
Top Strengths
1. Exceptional Teaching Clarity and Explanation
2. Proven Student Success and Results
3. Highly Respected and Admired Personality
Areas to Improve
1. Completing Chapters and Topics Consistently
2. Ensuring Comprehensive Content Coverage
3. Responding to Student Requests for Continuation
What students love
“Sir, I got 75 marks and 97.79 percentile in physics in JEE Mains 2023 because of you.”
8 likes
“Hello sir, your lecturing was really helpful. It's really good to learn from you. I want to request you to please continue your lectures!”
4 likes
“You are the best teacher to us, so please start sir.”
1 likes
“Sir, you are really a god during learning this lesson. I have got some precious things, thankful to you, they are really useful.”
1 likes
“I love your way of teaching, it's amazing, and especially the clarity that you give in each and every concept. Most people and students lack that.”
1 likes
“Super sir, amazing sir! Your teaching is awesome.”
1 likes
“Sir, please continue remaining chapters. Because of you, I get 1st rank in physics. Please complete the remaining chapters.”
1 likes
“Goat of all time 😎. Great explanation sir.”
1 likes
“Very good explanation sir... All my doubts are cleared. Thank you sir.”
“Thank you so much for the explanation sir! Glad I got a teacher like you for crushing physics!”
What could be better
“Namaste sir. You know your lessons are useful to many, but stopping in the middle is not good. Not thousands of students can afford 1.5L, 2.5L for AC campuses. Please think about it. Students got IIT seats because of your videos. Please continue.”
1 likes
“Sir, you haven't completed this chapter fully. You haven't made videos for many other topics. Please react fast.”
“Sir, at 46:45, the amplitude formula seems something wrong.”