Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Lakshya Army

Lakshya Army

Education
2.5
Poor

49 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 49 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, teacher's experience, tests & practice. Many students highlight many students actively ask specific questions about the...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

The teacher appears to be a primary resource for students seeking clarification on recruitment proce...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher is seen as experienced enough to answer complex queries about Army recruitment, but a si...

Tests & Practice

The comments do not provide any information regarding the provision of tests or practice materials b...

Flexibility

There is no information in the student comments to evaluate the teacher's flexibility in terms of te...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
Students appreciate some information provided ('Thank you so much sir for the information').
Students engage by asking specific questions, implying a belief in the teacher's knowledge.
Serious complaint about misleading information in the thumbnail, leading to an accusation of fraud, directly undermining teaching credibility and quality.
Teacher's Experience3.0
Students frequently ask specific questions about cutoffs, eligibility, and selection chances, indicating they perceive the teacher as knowledgeable and experienced in the Army recruitment process.
The incident of misleading information suggests a lack of ethical judgment or professional experience in content presentation.
Study Material2.0
The negative comment implies issues with the reliability or completeness of information provided, which could be considered part of study material.
Doubt Support3.5
Many students actively ask specific questions about their scores, eligibility, and chances of selection, indicating they feel comfortable seeking doubt clarification and guidance.
The general issue of misleading information could erode trust in the accuracy or reliability of the answers provided during doubt support.
Tests & Practice2.5
Flexibility2.5
Fees vs Value2.0
Some students express gratitude for information, implying perceived value from the content provided.
The fraud accusation directly implies a lack of value or even negative value if students are misled, potentially wasting their time and effort.
Teacher Personality2.0
General 'thank you' comments and students' willingness to ask questions suggest an approachable demeanor.
The accusation of fraud and misleading practices points to a significant flaw in the teacher's personality regarding honesty and transparency, severely damaging trust.

Top Strengths

1. Perceived as a source of information and guidance for recruitment processes

2. High student engagement in asking questions and seeking clarification

3. Apparent willingness to provide doubt support

Areas to Improve

1. Ensure accuracy and honesty in all content, especially titles and thumbnails

2. Rebuild trust and credibility with the student community

3. Provide reliable and complete information to avoid misleading students

What students love

“Thank you so much sir.”

1 likes

“Thank you so much sir for the information.”

“Jodhpur ARO 140 marks in Clerk trade. (RTI Reply) 2:27”

2 likes

“Barrackpore ARO physical 76. Exam 70+. Will I make it?”

“Assam from 150 GD.”

“Jhunjhunu ARO, 34 questions correct in Army Technical, also have a relation certificate. Will I be finalized?”

“ARO Bareilly Technical, Physical 88 numbers, 34 right questions. Will I make it or not?”

“185 GD OBC ARO Charkhi Dadri, will I make it?”

“Sir, I have 166 marks in GD ARO Agra. Will my number come in the final merit list?”

“Hello sir, I have Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry in my BSc. Can I fill priority 1 in the form now?”

1 likes

What could be better

“If you weren't going to tell the medical assistant cutoff, why did you write it in the thumbnail? I will file a fraud case against you.”

5 likes

Had a class with Lakshya Army?