Learn With Nauman

Physics

4.1

Great

10 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 10 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, tests & practice. Many students highlight students express general appreciation: 'thanks, you ...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Students generally appreciate the teacher's overall teaching quality, with direct positive feedback....

Teacher's Experience

The teacher appears experienced, handling multiple subjects and providing structured content. No com...

Tests & Practice

The teacher provides or is expected to provide ample practice material, particularly MCQs and exerci...

Fees vs Value

No direct information on fees is available. However, the consistent requests for more content and ov...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.0

Students express general appreciation: 'Thanks, you are a great teacher.'

Teacher's Experience4.0

Teacher covers multiple subjects (Physics and Math MCQs), indicating broad knowledge.

Students request specific chapter content and notes, suggesting a structured approach.

Study Material3.0

Students request various materials like 'all chapters' MCQs', 'exercise for chapter 12', 'PDF for these chapter notes', and 'important long questions', indicating existing or expected provision of such materials.

Teacher provides an 'MCQ series' for both Math and Physics.

Major complaint: 'This is not the smart syllabus at all.'

Students question syllabus alignment: 'Sir, are these MCQs according to the smart syllabus topics?'

Doubt Support3.0

Students feel comfortable asking specific questions: 'Sir, regarding question 7?'

Tests & Practice4.0

Strong student demand for practice materials: 'all chapters' MCQs', 'exercise for chapter 12', 'important long questions'.

Teacher provides an 'MCQ series' which students want continued.

Flexibility3.0

Students make requests for content timing and pace: 'will the video for chapter 12 be ready by tomorrow?', 'please don't start chapter 12 physics yet'.

Students request continuation of content series: 'Please continue the math and physics MCQ series'.

Lack of adaptability to syllabus changes: 'This is not the smart syllabus at all.'

Fees vs Value4.0

High demand for more content and general positive sentiment imply students find value in the teacher's offerings.

Teacher Personality4.0

Students express appreciation and respect: 'Thanks, you are a great teacher.', 'Mashallah sir, keep it up!'

Consistent use of 'Sir' indicates respectful student-teacher interaction.

Top Strengths

1. Teacher Personality

2. Teaching Quality

3. Tests & Practice

Areas to Improve

1. Syllabus Alignment (crucial for study material relevance)

2. Completeness of Study Material (addressing requests for all chapters' MCQs, notes, etc.)

3. Timeliness/Responsiveness (e.g., specific video delivery by tomorrow, consistent uploads)

What students love

“Thanks, you are a great teacher.”

1 likes

“Mashallah sir, keep it up! Please upload all chapters' MCQs.”

1 likes

“Sir, are these MCQs according to the smart syllabus topics?”

1 likes

“Sir, please do the exercise for chapter 12.”

1 likes

“Sir, will the video for chapter 12 be ready by tomorrow?”

“Sir, regarding question 7?”

“Sir, can I get the PDF for these chapter notes?”

“Sir, please also tell us the important long questions.”

“Sir, you haven't uploaded math MCQs today. Please continue the math and physics MCQ series.”

2 likes

“Sir, please don't start chapter 12 physics yet.”

2 likes

What could be better

“This is not the smart syllabus at all.”

Had a class with Learn With Nauman?