Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Learning is Target

Learning is Target

NDASSC
4.2
Great

23 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 23 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, study material, tests & practice. Many students highlight students' actual exam scores are consistently higher than ...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

The teaching effectively prepares students for actual exams, as evidenced by higher real exam scores...

Study Material

The study material is highly relevant and effective, as students report that test questions directly...

Tests & Practice

The tests and practice materials are exceptionally effective, accurately simulating actual exams and...

Teacher's Experience

While not explicitly stated, the teacher's ability to create highly predictive mock tests and align ...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality5.0
Students' actual exam scores are consistently higher than mock scores, indicating effective preparation.
Strong alignment between course content and test questions suggests a well-structured curriculum.
Teacher's Experience4.0
The effectiveness of mocks in predicting or under-predicting actual exam scores implies deep understanding of exam patterns and content.
No direct comments explicitly stating the teacher's years of experience or background.
Study Material5.0
Questions in tests are the same as those studied in the course, indicating high relevance and effectiveness of the study material.
Doubt Support3.0
No comments available to assess the quality or availability of doubt support.
Tests & Practice5.0
Mocks are highly effective, with actual exam scores consistently higher than mock scores.
Students achieve high scores in these practice tests, demonstrating their utility.
Strong alignment between course content and test questions enhances practice effectiveness.
One student mentioned 'reasoning somehow went wrong,' which could be a personal struggle rather than a flaw in the test itself.
Flexibility3.0
No comments available to assess this dimension.
Fees vs Value4.0
Students are achieving high scores and performing well in actual exams, suggesting excellent value for the investment.
The 'RWA course' mentioned implies a structured offering that students find beneficial.
No direct comments about the specific fees or pricing structure.
Teacher Personality4.0
The overwhelmingly positive student sentiment and lack of complaints suggest a generally positive and supportive learning environment.
No direct comments about the teacher's personality, communication style, or interaction.

Top Strengths

1. Tests & Practice

2. Study Material

3. Teaching Quality

Areas to Improve

1. Doubt Support (lack of data)

2. Flexibility (lack of data)

3. More direct feedback on teacher's personality/interaction

What students love

“My score in the actual exam has always been higher than in these mocks, even if by just 2 marks. For UP SI, I scored 135-140 on mocks and got 139 questions correct in the actual paper.”

1 likes

“Those who took the RWA course benefit from this test; the questions are the same as those studied in the course.”

“My score is 260 today.”

“My score is 246.”

1 likes

“My score is 246, EWS female.”

“My score is 240, OBC male.”

“Same score here.”

“Testbook really had a glitch, I used it.”

“My score is 226 today, reasoning somehow went wrong, only 39 correct.”

“My score is 230 overall.”

1 likes

Had a class with Learning is Target?