Library Mastaaru

CTET

2.1

Poor

27 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 27 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's study material, tests & practice, flexibility. The teacher's evaluation is significantly impacted by a complete absence of direct feed...

What students talk about most

Study Material

There are no student comments available to assess the quality, relevance, or availability of any stu...

Tests & Practice

The provided comments do not contain any feedback from students regarding tests, practice sessions, ...

Flexibility

Student comments do not offer any information to evaluate the teacher's flexibility concerning sched...

Teaching Quality

No direct feedback on teaching methods, but the widespread student confusion about critical eligibil...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

Students express significant confusion and frustration regarding qualification validity, which a CTET teacher/expert should ideally clarify effectively.

Teacher's Experience2.0

The comments highlight a complex and critical issue (qualification validity) that an experienced teacher/analyst in the CTET domain should be able to address with authoritative and clear guidance.

Study Material2.5

Doubt Support1.5

Students are asking fundamental and critical questions about eligibility and course validity, indicating a potential lack of effective or accessible doubt resolution on crucial topics.

Tests & Practice2.5

Flexibility2.5

Fees vs Value2.0

One comment vaguely mentions a 'good opportunity for poor students,' though its direct relation to the teacher's specific offering or fees is unclear.

The significant student complaints about invalidated qualifications raise concerns about the overall value, as students may have invested time and resources into courses now deemed invalid.

Teacher Personality2.0

The teacher's apparent lack of proactive communication or effective resolution regarding the widespread confusion and frustration about qualification validity could be perceived negatively by students.

Top Strengths

1. No direct strengths identified from student comments.

Areas to Improve

1. Provide clear and authoritative guidance on qualification validity for teaching roles.

2. Enhance doubt support mechanisms for critical eligibility questions.

3. Proactively communicate policy changes and their implications for students.

What students love

“Oc poor students kosam good opportunity.”

“Nagarjuna University Guntur also accepted Praveena as equal to B.A. I did M.A. Hindi in 2005 batch.”

“Nenu Praveena base pai MA Hindi (Braou) chesunnanu. They accept Praveena for MA Hindi at MVS College Mahbubur.”

“It's for Telangana state.”

2 likes

“Degree lo hindi literature vundi DSC ki eligible ha avthunda anna chepandi please.”

1 likes

“2014 before chesenna vallu elijibul annaru kada.”

1 likes

“Naku dsc lo 1:3 satificates verification ku pilichru adela.”

“After Hindi Vidwan How To Become a Hindi Teacher..? Is There Any Alternative To Achieve The Hindi Teacher Goal....?”

“Ap lo bridge course apply cheskovataniki enthavaraku time undi bro..”

4 likes

“Next bridge course exam notification yeppudu vasthai bro.”

2 likes

What could be better

“Yes, it is correct. Telangana TGT exam also did not accept those trained on Praveen during certificate verification. They said only those with Hindi in their degree are eligible.”

1 likes

“Nenu prasthuthaniki vidhwan chesthunnanu because of hpt kosam kaani nenu munde graduation complete chesanu with Hindi subject to ippudu Ila antunnaru...”

“Vidwan and HPT exams were conducted by the government, if they are not valid now, what should those who studied do?”

17 likes

“Lakhs of people have been trained through this course. Why is there a situation to change it? It's not right to allow the course and then say it's not valid.”

12 likes

“4, 5 years ago they said Vidhwan is not valid.”

Had a class with Library Mastaaru?