Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Manthan IQ

Manthan IQ

UPSC
2.5
Poor

35 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 35 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, tests & practice, flexibility. Manthan IQ is a polarizing educator, appreciated for his advocacy on student issues but ...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

The provided comments do not offer any specific information regarding the teacher's doubt support.

Tests & Practice

The provided comments do not offer any specific information regarding the teacher's tests and practi...

Flexibility

The provided comments do not offer any specific information regarding the teacher's flexibility.

Teacher's Experience

The teacher is seen as an advocate for students on policy matters, but some students strongly questi...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
One student found a session 'nice'.
Accused of misleading children.
Students state he needs to 'clear your concept' and that his statements are 'foolishly like this is no less than madness'.
Teacher's Experience2.5
Students support his advocacy on important exam issues (PET, vacancies), suggesting some perceived authority or knowledge of the system.
Students question his understanding of established exam patterns, stating 'This was clear for 3 years that Lower PCS vacancy would come through PET. Now talking foolishly like this is no less than madness'.
Criticized for needing to 'clear your concept'.
Study Material2.0
Accused of potentially manipulating information or stances to 'sell your courses'.
Doubt Support3.0
Tests & Practice3.0
Flexibility3.0
Fees vs Value2.0
Accused of having commercial motives, 'If PET is removed, then you will sell your courses'.
Teacher Personality2.5
Perceived as an advocate for student issues ('raised your voice absolutely correctly', 'We support you sir').
Capable of delivering 'nice sessions'.
Accused of misleading students.
Criticized for having unclear concepts and 'talking foolishly like this is no less than madness'.

Top Strengths

1. Advocacy for student issues and concerns

2. Ability to conduct engaging sessions (based on limited feedback)

3. Receives support for his stance on policy matters

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and conceptual clarity in teaching

2. Avoiding statements perceived as misleading or foolish

3. Addressing perceptions of commercial motives over student welfare

What students love

It's a matter of great happiness and we can be proud of it.

1 likes

Congratulations!

1 likes

Congratulations brother!

Great, Gurudev, you have raised your voice absolutely correctly.

We support you sir.

Nice session sir.

This recruitment came after 7 years, it's very important. What was the benefit of giving PET in 2022, 2023, 2024 if no vacancies came?

This is a good opportunity for the government to win the trust of the youth. Humble request to Yogi ji, please give a chance to appear in Lower PCS exam.

The eligible candidates will be selected. Therefore, I request the government and the commission to consider this.

Some people are talking about logic, so let me tell you that in some previous vacancies, people with 0 PET marks were called.

What could be better

If PET is removed, then you will sell your courses. PET will not be removed. Beware any teacher who says this.

1 likes

Sir, please do not mislead the children. A minimum cutoff can be a valid reason.

1 likes

This cannot happen. First, clear your concept, brother, then get selections.

This was clear for 3 years that Lower PCS vacancy would come through PET. Now talking foolishly like this is no less than madness.

Had a class with Manthan IQ?