Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Marcos

Marcos

CTET
2.8
Poor

60 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 60 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, study material, doubt support. Many students highlight students trust the teacher with significant practical tes...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

Students show high trust in the teacher's capability, even suggesting he handle large-scale official...

Study Material

There is no direct feedback on the quality or availability of study materials in the provided commen...

Doubt Support

Students actively seek information and clarification, indicating an expectation of support. However,...

Teaching Quality

While some students offer high praise, there are significant concerns about the accuracy of informat...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
General high praise from some students ('You are incomparable, Guru ji')
Concerns about misleading information or unrealistic expectations regarding exam scores ('This is a false illusion; full marks have never been given')
Perceived neglect of certain student groups ('Sir, you forgot about the Bihar Police candidates')
Teacher's Experience4.0
Students trust the teacher with significant practical test responsibilities ('Guru ji, you should take the CSBC Driving Test Tender')
Ability to attract students from distant locations, implying a strong reputation
Study Material3.0
Doubt Support3.0
Students actively seek information and clarification on various topics ('please make a video about when the next test will be', 'if someone wants to drive a small vehicle first, will they get a small vehicle?')
Potential for specific student groups to feel overlooked ('Sir, you forgot about the Bihar Police candidates')
Tests & Practice2.0
High student demand and willingness to travel long distances for tests
Some students support paid tests to ensure serious participation
Good facilities for practical tests ('The ground looks very good')
Strong opposition to increasing test fees, perceived as exploitative ('You are charging for a free test. You are spoiling the market rate.')
Concerns about unfair registration and access for non-academy students
Serious accusation of cheating during tests ('The Marcos team cheated the students today')
Flexibility2.0
Students hope for individual accommodation for tests ('If I get a chance by evening, it would be your kindness')
Teacher is expected to provide logistical support (location links, travel advice)
Lack of access for non-academy students ('most of your students are from your academy, only 10% are outsiders')
Perceived neglect of certain student groups or exam preparations ('Sir, you forgot about the Bihar Police candidates')
Fees vs Value2.0
Some students see value in paying for tests to ensure serious participation ('Only serious people will come for 200')
Strong backlash against perceived misleading 'free' offers and escalating fees ('You are charging for a free test. You are spoiling the market rate.')
Accusations of cheating, implying a lack of value for money or outright fraud
Criticism of pricing strategy, perceived as not genuinely 'free' or misleading
Teacher Personality2.0
Some students hold the teacher in high regard and perceive kindness ('You are incomparable, Guru ji', 'it would be your kindness')
Inappropriate and potentially disrespectful language used ('The talk about 'Marni' and 'marriage' is wrong')
Perceived lack of understanding or empathy regarding student expectations for 'free' services

Top Strengths

1. Strong student demand and willingness to travel for tests

2. Perceived expertise in conducting practical tests

3. Some students appreciate efforts to ensure serious participation in tests

Areas to Improve

1. Transparency and fairness in test pricing and registration processes

2. Communication style, avoiding inappropriate or misleading language

3. Ensuring equitable access and attention for all students, not just academy members

What students love

Sir, I couldn't register for some reason, but I will still come from Nawada on the test day. If I get a chance by evening, it would be your kindness if I could take the test.

4 likes

It's a good decision, keep it at 200 instead of 150, sir. I couldn't come for the free one. 1000 fake registrations were made and they didn't show up. Only serious people will come for 200.

Sir, please make a video about when the next test will be and how to fill the form, so I can definitely come for the next test. Sir, I have an HMV license.

1 likes

Sir, please send the location link, I am coming from Madhubani.

1 likes

Sir, I am coming from Gaya by train. Where would be the best place to get off? Please reply, sir.

1 likes

You are incomparable, Guru ji 🙏

The ground looks very good.

Guru ji, you should take the CSBC Driving Test Tender. ❤

Sir, if someone wants to drive a small vehicle first, will they get a small vehicle?

1 likes

Sir, some students will join SSC GD and some Bihar Police.

What could be better

This is a false illusion; full marks have never been given in the exam. 72 is safe; more than that will put many futures at risk.

3 likes

You are charging for a free test. You are spoiling the market rate. This should be strongly opposed. Why should we pay 50 extra? If you stay silent today, the test price will quickly go from 150 to 200, then 250 and 300. That's why I strongly oppose this test.

3 likes

Sir, most of your students are from your academy, only 10% are outsiders, that's why no one else is getting registered.

2 likes

The talk about 'Marni' and 'marriage' is wrong. People are not going there to eat for free; they are not beggars. They won't come to eat your free food.

2 likes

The 'Marni' and 'marriage' thing doesn't match, Guru ji.

1 likes

Sir, you forgot about the Bihar Police candidates.

The Marcos team cheated the students today.

Sir, this is not good 😂. You should have kept it at 51 rupees. All students knew what 'free' meant 🙏😄😋.

Had a class with Marcos?