Mr.Practice¹⁷²⁹

UPSCComputer Science

2.4

Poor

25 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 25 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, doubt support, flexibility. Many students highlight students actively seek advice based on his personal experien...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

Students show high interest in Mr.Practice's personal UPSC journey and experience, viewing him as a ...

Doubt Support

There are no comments available to evaluate the teacher's doubt support, leading to a neutral assess...

Flexibility

No student comments address the flexibility of the teacher's approach, schedule, or content delivery...

Fees vs Value

There are no comments discussing the fees charged or the perceived value for money, leading to a neu...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

Student criticized the quantity/depth of his writing/content ('Brother, do you have to write so little? I could write more than this.')

Teacher's Experience3.5

Students actively seek advice based on his personal experience ('Sir, please make a video on what mistakes we should avoid... according to your experience.')

Students inquire about his optional subject, educational qualification, and preparation journey ('What was your optional, sir?', 'How did you manage to stay focused until the 5th attempt?')

Accusations of fake/copied material could indirectly question the authenticity of his claimed experience or success if he is misrepresenting his work.

Study Material1.0

One vague comment 'Thanks for the information' could imply some useful content.

Multiple serious accusations of fake and copied materials ('This is fake, a copy.', 'I can't believe this is the copy of Rank 20.')

Criticism regarding the insufficient depth or quantity of written content ('Brother, do you have to write so little? I could write more than this.')

Doubt Support3.0

Tests & Practice1.5

A direct and serious complaint questions the authenticity and timeline of test papers ('This is fake, a copy. The 2025 mains ended in September, and this test is from December 2025. How is that possible?')

Flexibility3.0

Fees vs Value3.0

Teacher Personality2.5

Students seem to find him approachable, addressing him as 'brother' and asking personal questions.

Some comments suggest he provides general encouragement ('Keep preparing well, it will surely happen.', 'Don't worry, be regular.')

Accusations of fakery and misrepresentation severely undermine his perceived integrity and trustworthiness.

Top Strengths

1. Perceived personal experience in UPSC preparation

2. Approachability and willingness to share personal insights

3. Ability to provide general information/guidance

Areas to Improve

1. Authenticity and integrity of study materials and test papers

2. Depth and quality of content and example answers

3. Transparency regarding sources and personal achievements

What students love

“Sir, please make a video on what mistakes we should avoid during preparation to get selected, according to your experience.”

2 likes

“Good decision, brother.”

1 likes

“Thanks for the information.”

“Keep preparing well, it will surely happen.”

“Don't worry, be regular.”

“How are you preparing for Math?”

“What was your optional, sir?”

“What was your medium, and what is your optional? Also, which teacher did you study Geography from for GS?”

“What is your educational qualification, brother?”

“How did you manage to stay focused until the 5th attempt?”

1 likes

What could be better

“This is fake, a copy. The 2025 mains ended in September, and this test is from December 2025. How is that possible?”

1 likes

“Brother, do you have to write so little? I could write more than this.”

1 likes

“I can't believe this is the copy of Rank 20.”

Had a class with Mr.Practice¹⁷²⁹?