Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
MSW STUDY FOR JOB

MSW STUDY FOR JOB

CTET
2.1
Poor

88 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 88 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, study material, teaching quality. Many students highlight demonstrates knowledge of exam specifics like answer k...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

The teacher shows some experience in navigating exam processes like answer key updates. However, con...

Study Material

While some 'good information' and guidance on answer keys are provided, there's no direct evidence o...

Teaching Quality

The teacher helps some students reach minimum passing scores, often through guidance on answer key c...

Doubt Support

Students engage by asking questions, but there's no clear evidence of structured or effective doubt ...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
Helped students achieve passing scores (100, 90, 109 marks)
Provided 'good information'
Perceived as 'crying about 55%' by some students
Accused of giving 'false hope' regarding score increases
Some students achieved higher scores independently
Teacher's Experience2.5
Demonstrates knowledge of exam specifics like answer key challenges
Ability to provide 'good information'
Accused of giving 'false hope' which questions judgment
Focus on '55%' suggests a limited scope of expertise or confidence
Study Material2.5
Students appreciate 'good information'
Guidance on 'correct' answers and set corrections
No explicit praise for comprehensive or high-quality study materials
Implied insufficiency for higher scores ('studied without help and got 60%')
Doubt Support2.0
Students feel comfortable asking questions (e.g., 'update regarding age')
No specific comments on effective doubt resolution
Accusations of 'false hope' suggest a lack of accurate guidance when sought
Tests & Practice2.0
Guidance on checking scores against official answer keys
No mention of teacher-provided practice tests, mock exams, or structured assessments
Flexibility2.0
Negative comments hint at a lack of responsiveness to broader student concerns ('making us overage')
No direct evidence of flexibility in teaching methods or scheduling
Fees vs Value2.0
Helped some students achieve passing marks, which could be perceived as value
Strong negative sentiment ('shut down your channel', 'false hope') indicates poor value for some
Students achieving higher scores independently question the teacher's contribution
Teacher Personality1.5
Some students express gratitude and respect ('thanks sir ji', 'your grace')
Perceived as 'crying about 55%' and overly negative
Accused of giving 'false hope'
Harsh criticism like 'shut down your channel' points to a very negative perception
Seen as potentially distracting or unhelpful regarding broader student issues

Top Strengths

1. Guidance on official answer key corrections

2. Helping students achieve minimum passing scores

3. Providing some 'good information'

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy of predictions and avoiding false hope

2. Focus on comprehensive teaching beyond minimum passing

3. Teacher's public persona and communication style

What students love

“Sir, I barely scored 100 marks thanks to your grace. ❤️”

2 likes

“Thanks sir ji 🙏 for good information 👍 🙏”

“Yes, it should come again.”

“Paper 2 math and science set A, with the change in Q62, I got 90 marks 🙏🏻”

“It's correct now. According to the answer key, I have 109 marks, earlier it was 107.”

“Paper 1 is correct.”

“Thanks sir ji”

“Yesterday I checked, I had 87 correct. Today I checked, I have 90.”

“C set has been corrected.”

“Sir, what is the update regarding age?”

2 likes

What could be better

“This teacher just cries about 55%. I studied without help and got 60%. Wahh oye shero.”

5 likes

“Brother, shut down your channel.”

3 likes

“Those with 55% are sitting at home, no one comes out to protest. So let the master cadre come, we can take the exam. Why are you making us overage?”

3 likes

“Nothing changed 😒 Sir, you said one or two more marks would increase, but these marks won't increase. Has the system ever worked correctly? If one or two marks increase, one or two decrease. Why are you giving us false hope?”

Had a class with MSW STUDY FOR JOB?