Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
PARMAR OFFICERS

PARMAR OFFICERS

NDA
4.0
Great

22 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 22 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, fees vs value. Many students highlight students report high scores and successful attempts (e....

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

The teacher's instruction and core content are highly effective, consistently enabling students to a...

Teacher's Experience

Parmar Officers is perceived as an experienced and authoritative figure, trusted by students for com...

Fees vs Value

Despite some material issues, the teacher's content demonstrably leads to significant student succes...

Teacher Personality

The teacher maintains a positive and respectful relationship with students, who trust their expertis...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.5
Students report high scores and successful attempts (e.g., 'Attempted 70, Correct: 52. Good score!', 'Attempted 50 questions without guessing. Thanks a lot!').
Specific materials like CGL PYQ and top 500 questions are credited for student success.
Teacher's Experience4.5
Students seek direct guidance on long-term preparation ('Sir, if I prepare for OTA from now... Please guide me.'), indicating trust in expertise.
References to 'CGL PYQ 4.0, 5.0' suggest a long-standing and evolving teaching methodology.
Anticipation for a 'Parmar Railway channel' implies a recognized and respected expert in the field.
Study Material3.0
Core materials like PYQ series, top questions, and CGL notes are highly effective and contribute to student success.
Students express a desire for more video content ('upload all hidden videos'), indicating its perceived value.
Significant issues with missing questions in PDFs ('few questions are not in the PDF').
Problems with the accuracy and completeness of answer keys ('Q26-Q32 are missing', 'answers' calculations are not correct', 'Nothing is ticked in the Telegram one').
Incorrect answers provided in materials ('Question 60 - option C is the correct answer, not what's provided').
Doubt Support3.0
Students feel comfortable asking for general guidance on exam strategy ('Please guide me').
No direct comments on the effectiveness or availability of specific doubt resolution for questions or concepts.
The prevalence of incorrect answers in materials suggests a potential gap in addressing student queries about accuracy.
Tests & Practice3.0
Practice tests or question sets are clearly provided, as students report their scores and attempts.
These practice opportunities contribute to students' ability to perform well in exams.
Widespread issues with the accuracy and completeness of answer keys for practice tests ('not the answer key for Set A', 'recheck question 79', 'Nothing is ticked').
Incorrect solutions provided for specific questions undermine the value of self-assessment.
Flexibility3.5
Students request access to 'hidden videos' and 'all hidden videos of the CDS batch,' suggesting a desire for on-demand or flexible content access.
A student successfully used materials (PYQ, notes) without taking the main CDS batch, indicating some flexibility in resource utilization.
Fees vs Value4.0
Numerous students report high scores and success, even those using specific materials without a full batch, indicating strong educational value.
The anticipation for new channels suggests a high perceived value and willingness to engage with future offerings.
No direct comments on fees, but the issues with answer keys could potentially detract from perceived value if not addressed.
Teacher Personality4.0
Students address the teacher respectfully ('Sir') and seek guidance, indicating a positive and trusting rapport.
The overall positive sentiment and expressions of gratitude suggest a well-liked and respected educator.

Top Strengths

1. Effective Teaching & Student Outcomes

2. Teacher's Expertise & Guidance

3. Student Engagement & Trust

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and Completeness of Answer Keys

2. Quality Control of Study Material PDFs

3. Formalized Doubt Resolution for Material Errors

What students love

“Attempted 70, Correct: 52. Good score!”

5 likes

“Sir, I didn't take the CDS batch. I just did your CGL PYQ 4.0, 5.0, top 500 questions, and CGL notes. I attempted 50 questions without guessing. Thanks a lot!”

1 likes

“Waiting for Parmar Railway channel. Looking forward to it!”

1 likes

“Attempted 66, Correct 36, Wrong 30. Approximately 20 marks cut off, 20% cleared!”

1 likes

“68 attempted, 49 correct. Good performance!”

“Attempted 79, Correct 49-51. Solid effort!”

“Attempt 60, Correct 44, Wrong 16. Decent score!”

“If possible, please upload all hidden videos of the CDS batch; it might be helpful for us.”

“Sir, if I prepare for OTA from now, will I make it for 2026? I am preparing for CGL and other SSC exams. Please guide me.”

“Please upload all hidden videos of CDS 2 2025. They would be very useful.”

1 likes

What could be better

“Sir, in the answer key, Q26-Q32 are missing.”

1 likes

“Sir, few questions are not in the PDF; please provide solutions for them also.”

1 likes

“Sir, this is not the answer key for Set A.”

“Sir, please send the answer key for GK Set A too. The answers' calculations are not correct.”

“Sir, please recheck question 79.”

“Where is the answer key? Nothing is ticked in the Telegram one, sir.”

“Question 60 - option C is the correct answer, not what's provided.”

Had a class with PARMAR OFFICERS?