PATTAYAT PHILOSOPHIX

Philosophy

4.2

Great

34 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 34 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, fees vs value. Many students highlight videos are described as very helpful and nice, provides...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Students consistently praise the teacher's videos and classes as highly helpful and valuable, leadin...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher is perceived as experienced and knowledgeable in Philosophy and Logic, with students tru...

Fees vs Value

Students express significant appreciation for the helpful videos and valuable guidance, indicating a...

Teacher Personality

The teacher is perceived as supportive and appreciative, as evidenced by the respectful and grateful...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.0

Videos are described as very helpful and nice

Provides valuable advice and guidance

Students actively request more videos of similar quality

One vague negative comment: 'Very bad passes'

Teacher's Experience4.0

Students seek guidance for competitive exams like UGC NET and SSB PGT

Perceived as knowledgeable and capable of preparing students for advanced topics

Study Material3.0

Students are eager to receive notes for Philosophy and Logic, indicating value for the teacher's content

The need for students to request notes implies a current lack of readily available, comprehensive study materials

Doubt Support2.0

The existence of a Telegram group suggests an attempt to provide a platform for support

A student reported being removed from or unable to access the Telegram group, indicating a significant issue with reliability and communication

Tests & Practice2.0

Students are preparing for competitive exams (UGC NET, SSB PGT) which inherently require practice

No direct mention or evidence of tests, quizzes, or practice materials being provided by the teacher

Flexibility3.0

Students feel comfortable making specific requests for new video topics (e.g., Philosophy of Language, Indian Philosophy, Symbolic Logic)

Requests for videos tailored for NET preparation

No explicit confirmation that these specific content requests are consistently met or addressed

Fees vs Value4.0

Videos are consistently described as 'helpful' and 'valuable'

No complaints about fees, implying content is free or highly affordable, enhancing perceived value

Teacher Personality4.0

Students use appreciative and respectful language ('Thank you sir')

Teacher is described as providing 'valuable advice and guidance for our lovable students'

Overall positive and supportive tone from students

The Telegram group issue, while not directly personality-related, could reflect on communication management

Top Strengths

1. Engaging and helpful teaching quality

2. High perceived value of content and guidance

3. Strong student trust in teacher's expertise for competitive exams

Areas to Improve

1. Reliability and accessibility of doubt support channels

2. Availability of structured study materials like notes

3. Provision of tests and practice materials for exam preparation

What students love

“Thank you sir, your video helps us a lot.”

1 likes

“Thank you so much sir for your valuable advice and guidance for our lovable students.”

1 likes

“Very very nice class sir. Thank you.”

1 likes

“Please give your notes sir for Philosophy and Logic. I am preparing for UGC NET and SSB PGT.”

2 likes

“Please make more videos like this, sir.”

1 likes

“Sir, please make videos for NET.”

1 likes

“Sir, please make a video on Philosophy of Language.”

“Sir, please start a symbolic logic class from Basson and Conner book.”

“Sir, when will the video on Indian Philosophy come?”

1 likes

“Sir, please make a video for NET.”

What could be better

“Sir, I had joined your Telegram group, but you removed me, or the group is no longer showing. I can't join. Sir, please add me.”

1 likes

“Very bad passes.”

Had a class with PATTAYAT PHILOSOPHIX?