Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Phil Cool Math

Phil Cool Math

Mathematics
3.2
Average

11 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 11 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, teaching quality, teacher's experience. Many students highlight implied helpfulness and a clear desire to simplif...

What students talk about most

Teacher Personality

The teacher appears to have a helpful and approachable demeanor, consistently striving to make chall...

Teaching Quality

Phil Cool Math is effective at simplifying complex mathematical concepts and providing detailed expl...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher shows experience through their knowledge of diverse mathematical approaches and sound pr...

Tests & Practice

There is no specific student feedback regarding formal tests or dedicated practice materials, making...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality3.2
Amazing video!
This explanation really helped me understand the concept better.
Phil Cool Math makes complex topics easy to grasp.
Provides detailed step-by-step solutions (e.g., algebraic, logarithmic, root finding).
Offers conceptual advice (e.g., 'always verify each solution', 'avoid having to memorize the polynomials').
Solutions are sometimes incorrect ('Everything else is made up.').
Contains calculation errors ('Calculation error of several millions.').
Loss of significant digits occurred.
Methods can be overly complicated for simple problems.
Mistakes found in derivation steps.
Solutions only work for specific cases, not generally.
Initial setup is unclear for some students ('I'm lost from the beginning.').
Teacher's Experience3.0
Demonstrates a solid grasp of various mathematical methods and good problem-solving practices.
Shows ability to provide alternative methods ('avoid having to memorize the polynomials').
Frequent occurrence of critical errors (incorrect solutions, calculation errors, loss of significant digits).
Solutions sometimes lack general applicability, suggesting inconsistencies in expertise or thoroughness.
Study Material2.8
The video format is appreciated ('Amazing video!').
Poor audio quality, making it difficult to hear.
Horrible translation issues ('What is a 'lid'? What is an 'asterisk'?').
Video moves too fast, requiring constant pausing.
Doubt Support2.5
Lack of clarity in initial explanations ('Could you please explain the initial setup more clearly? I'm lost from the beginning.').
Tests & Practice3.0
Flexibility2.5
The video moves too fast; it's hard to follow without pausing constantly.
Fees vs Value3.0
Teacher Personality3.5
Implied helpfulness and a clear desire to simplify complex topics for students.
Contributes to a positive learning atmosphere by making concepts easy to grasp.

Top Strengths

1. Ability to simplify complex mathematical topics.

2. Provides detailed, step-by-step problem solutions.

3. Engaging video format (for some students).

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy and generalizability of mathematical solutions.

2. Technical quality of study materials (audio, translation, pacing).

3. Clarity of initial explanations and proactive doubt support.

What students love

Amazing video!

3 likes

√(x) + 12 / √(x) = 7. Let u = √(x). u + 12 / u = 7. This leads to u^2 - 7u + 12 = 0, which factors to (u - 3)(u - 4) = 0. So u=3 or u=4, meaning √(x)=3 or √(x)=4, which gives x=9 or x=16.

It's easy to see that 2 is one of the roots. To avoid having to memorize the polynomials for the difference of two cubes, divide the polynomial with exponent three by (x - 2). This gives x^2 + 4x + 4. From this we find two imaginary roots -1 + √3 and -1√3, which together with the real root 2 are the solution.

4ˣ - 192 = 0 → 4ˣ = 192 → 4ˣ = 64 * 3. Taking log base 4: xlog₄4 = log₄64 + log₄3. Since log₄4 = 1 and 64 = 4³, x = 3 + log₄3 ≈ 3.792.

5^x+1=6^x, (x+1)log5=xlog6. x(log6 - log5)=log5. x= (log5)/ (log6-log5).

There is only one solution. That's why you always verify each solution when you square both sides.

The final result (not explicitly stated in the exercise) is: +0 - 32 * square root of 2.

This explanation really helped me understand the concept better.

Phil Cool Math makes complex topics easy to grasp.

Could you please explain the initial setup more clearly? I'm lost from the beginning.

What could be better

Plot the graph of this function. You will see that the graph passes through the x-axis at 0 and -4. These are the true solutions. Everything else is made up. Essentially, it is a fit for these two numbers.

2 likes

Horrible translation. What is a 'lid'? What is an 'asterisk'?

A loss of significant digits occurred with log5-log6 (resulting in 2 significant digits).

Calculation error of several millions.

The method used here is overly complicated for such a simple problem.

I found a mistake in the third step of the derivation.

The video moves too fast; it's hard to follow without pausing constantly.

The audio quality is poor, making it difficult to hear what you're saying.

This solution only works for specific cases, not generally.

Had a class with Phil Cool Math?