Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Prof MAD

Prof MAD

NDA
4.1
Great

58 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 58 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, flexibility. Many students highlight very good explanation and easy to understand, great expla...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Prof MAD excels at making complex topics easy to understand and remember, often simplifying concepts...

Teacher's Experience

Prof MAD demonstrates significant expertise, often surpassing traditional instructors in clarity and...

Flexibility

The nature of the comments suggests an online, self-paced learning environment, implying good flexib...

Fees vs Value

Students perceive high educational value from Prof MAD's teaching, often comparing it favorably to o...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.5
Very good explanation and easy to understand
Great explanation, better than university professor
Super good experience and perfect explanation
Simplifies things
The best explanation I have found
Best physics teacher ever, delivers concept making it easy to understand and remember
Clarifies complex concepts, solves long-standing confusion
Offers alternative methods to analyze electrical circuits
Great job, better than my instructor
Factual error in a graph (at 05:13)
Didn't explain RLC circuit well enough (missed 3 cases and parallel circuits)
Teacher's Experience4.0
Compared favorably to university professors and other instructors
Considered 'best physics teacher ever'
Ability to solve long-standing mysteries/confusion for students
Specific factual error and incomplete explanations suggest minor oversight in certain areas
Study Material3.5
Animations help so much, great video
Very nice video
Graph at 05:13 is wrong
Didn't explain RLC circuit well enough and missed parallel circuits
Doubt Support3.0
Tests & Practice3.0
Students rely on his teaching for exams and he 'never disappoints'
Flexibility4.0
Students 'follow your channel'
Implies an online, on-demand format
Fees vs Value4.0
Explanations are 'better than university professor' and 'best explanation I have found'
Reliable for exams, 'never disappoint'
Teacher Personality4.0
Students express gratitude ('Thank U Sir', 'thank you very much!', 'Wow, thanks')
Overall positive sentiment suggests a well-liked teacher

Top Strengths

1. Exceptional teaching quality, especially in simplifying complex concepts

2. High perceived expertise and ability to clarify long-standing confusion

3. Effective use of visual aids like animations in study materials

Areas to Improve

1. Ensuring factual accuracy in all study materials (e.g., graphs)

2. Providing more comprehensive coverage of specific topics (e.g., RLC circuits)

3. Explicitly addressing doubt support or practice materials (if not already a feature)

What students love

Very good explanation and easy to understand. Thank U Sir.

6 likes

Great explanation, better than university professor.

6 likes

Super good experience and perfect explanation.

4 likes

Wow, thanks to simplify things.

2 likes

The best explanation I have found, thank you very much!

1 likes

I just wanted to tell you that you are the best physics teacher ever. I've been relying on you for my exams and you never disappoint, you deliver the concept making it easy to understand and remember.

The animations help so much, great video, keep it up!!

Oh, no, I didn't find until now that Load's Voltage and Current are in the same phase. The mystery of the past year has been solved.

Thank you so much for your very nice video and very clear explanation. I've been searching for a long time for a method other than complex numbers to analyze electrical circuits.

Great job, better than my instructor. I follow your channel.

What could be better

At 05:13, your graph is WRONG! It's a common mistake. Same mistake found in many textbooks. You can do the real measurement or put a resistor in the simulation. You will see what's correct.

1 likes

You didn’t explain the RLC circuit well enough. You should have explained the 3 cases there - Xc > XL, Xc = XL, and Xc < XL. You didn’t explain parallel RC, RL, and RLC circuits at all too.

Had a class with Prof MAD?