Psc Wali

UPSC

1.6

Bad

43 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 43 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's flexibility, teaching quality, teacher's experience. Many students highlight content is complete (as per one student comment), implied...

What students talk about most

Flexibility

There's an indication of potential inflexibility in the course schedule or requirements, as students...

Teaching Quality

While the content might be comprehensive, the teacher struggles to provide clear guidance, essential...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher may possess subject knowledge, but there's a significant gap in providing practical, exp...

Teacher Personality

While students maintain a respectful tone, there's a clear breakdown of trust due to misleading info...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

Content is complete (as per one student comment)

Lack of clear guidance on preparation strategy

Failure to provide essential exam and job-related information proactively

Perception that guidance might be ineffective for general candidates

Teacher's Experience2.0

Implied subject knowledge to cover extensive content

Lack of practical guidance on syllabus, exam details, and job specifics

Inability to address basic student queries effectively

Potential lack of realistic guidance regarding job prospects

Study Material1.5

Content is complete (as per one student comment)

Lack of clear syllabus alignment for the 'complete' content

Absence of Previous Year Questions (PYQs), a critical component for UPSC

Missing crucial exam logistics, dates, and application procedures

Doubt Support1.0

Numerous basic and complex student questions remain unanswered or unaddressed

Students resort to asking peers for clarification on important queries

Lack of proactive information dissemination to prevent common doubts

Tests & Practice1.0

Direct complaint about the absence of Previous Year Questions (PYQs)

No mention or indication of mock tests, quizzes, or other practice mechanisms

Flexibility2.5

Student request for 'CPCT should be given time' suggests current course structure lacks flexibility

Fees vs Value1.0

Repeated complaints about fees being charged despite promises of free content

Severe breach of trust regarding financial commitments

Perception of very poor value due to misleading information about costs

Teacher Personality2.0

Students still address the teacher respectfully as 'ma'am'

Significant breach of trust due to misleading information about fees

Perceived lack of transparency and responsiveness to student queries

Students resort to challenging tones when demanding essential content like PYQs

Top Strengths

1. Potential for comprehensive content coverage

Areas to Improve

1. Transparency and honesty regarding course fees

2. Inclusion of Previous Year Questions (PYQs) and clear syllabus alignment

3. Providing comprehensive guidance on exam logistics, preparation, and job details

What students love

“Everything is complete, just tell us the syllabus.”

2 likes

“Where will the job locations be, ma'am?”

1 likes

“Ma'am, could the exam center be very far away?”

1 likes

“It says you have to serve for at least 5 years to be eligible for transfer to another unit. Does this mean you can't apply for another job before 5 years, or is it about transfer/promotion? Please reply if anyone understands.”

1 likes

“CPCT should be given time.”

1 likes

“Is CPCT compulsory, ma'am?”

1 likes

“Should documents also be sent by post as hard copies?”

“Tell us the exam date and joining procedure if it clears.”

“Ma'am, how do I prepare?”

“What is the last date for the form?”

What could be better

“Don't waste time on this; only PSC candidates get the posts.”

1 likes

“Sister, if you have the guts to create content, then tell us the PYQs; no one can tell us that.”

“You said no money would be charged.”

“Money is being deducted, ma'am.”

“There are fees; it's not free.”

“Fees are being charged.”

Had a class with Psc Wali?