@ pseb education papers

Board ExamsScience

3.2

Average

141 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 141 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, doubt support, flexibility. Many students highlight clear explanations for some topics.. A teacher whose exam predic...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

While one student praised the explanation, there's insufficient data to fully assess teaching qualit...

Doubt Support

There is no specific feedback regarding doubt support.

Flexibility

There is no specific feedback regarding flexibility.

Fees vs Value

There is no specific feedback regarding fees or value for money.

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality3.5

Clear explanations for some topics.

Limited feedback on general teaching methodology.

Teacher's Experience3.0

Excitement and gratitude from students whose papers matched exams.

Sense of relief and success.

Frustration and anger from students whose papers were fake or inaccurate.

Distrust and accusations of deception.

Threats due to perceived fraud.

Study Material3.0

Highly accurate predictions for some exams, particularly Computer Science.

Materials sometimes contain exact or highly similar exam questions.

Perceived as 'real papers' by many beneficiaries.

Materials frequently perceived as 'fake' or inaccurate by other students.

Inconsistency in accuracy across different papers/subjects.

Incorrect answers in some materials.

Language barrier (not always in English).

Accusations of using old or repeated papers.

Doubt Support3.2

Tests & Practice3.0

Practice papers often contain questions that appear in actual exams.

Provides a significant advantage to students who receive accurate predictions.

Practice papers are often inaccurate or completely different from actual exams.

Perceived as 'fake' practice, leading to wasted effort.

Inconsistent reliability.

Flexibility3.2

Fees vs Value3.2

Teacher Personality2.8

Receives expressions of gratitude and politeness from some students.

Subject to accusations of buying comments.

Faces threats from highly dissatisfied students.

Top Strengths

1. Exceptional accuracy in predicting exam questions for specific subjects (e.g., Computer Science).

2. Ability to provide highly relevant study material that can significantly aid exam preparation when accurate.

3. Strong positive impact and gratitude from students who benefit from accurate predictions.

Areas to Improve

1. Improve consistency and reliability of study materials across all subjects and papers.

2. Ensure accuracy of all provided answers and content.

3. Address language accessibility for study materials (e.g., providing English versions).

4. Manage student expectations transparently to avoid accusations of 'fake' papers and build trust.

What students love

“Sir, thank you so much! The 3 computer papers you provided for 11th class, one of them actually came in the exam.”

2 likes

“This is real paper, finally found it!”

3 likes

“Our paper was the same, ma'am.”

3 likes

“Thank you sir!”

2 likes

“Good morning sir, you explained it very well today. I will get these questions in the exam.”

1 likes

“Thanks for this paper.”

1 likes

“Sir, it was truly the exact same paper!”

1 likes

“The paper was 80% real.”

“Computer paper was real.”

“Thank you so much sir, this paper came! 🎉”

What could be better

“Sir, your paper never comes. 😢😡”

2 likes

“All papers are fake, only the first one was the same. 😢”

1 likes

“Sir, the answer to the first MCQ is wrong. 😂”

“Only the Punjabi paper was the same, no other was. I just cut the paper after hearing their language. 😂”

“If this isn't real, I know a hacker and I'll pay him to hack your account.”

“Questions were not given in English. 😡”

“This is not a real paper.”

“These comments are all bought. 😅😅”

“But sir, this paper came last time. 😢 It seems like a fake paper.”

“This is not real.”

Had a class with @ pseb education papers?