Rakesh Sir Maths Classes
81 comments
Review summary
Based on 81 comments, created with AI
Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, study material. Many students highlight students understood concepts well and easily., helped ...
What students talk about most
Evaluation breakdown
Top Strengths
1. Exceptional Teaching Quality and Concept Clarity
2. Proven Track Record of Exam Success (HTET)
3. High-Quality and Confidence-Building Practice Questions
Areas to Improve
1. Ensure 100% accuracy in all study material and solutions.
2. Explicitly highlight or introduce dedicated doubt support mechanisms.
3. Address general student performance issues (e.g., low scores) with targeted strategies.
What students love
“Sir, I've seen your first class and understood it well. Thank you so much, sir. I only understand math taught by you. You clear concepts very well.”
3 likes
“Sir, there's no need to redo the first class because I'm understanding it well from there. And thank you, sir.”
3 likes
“Sir, watching your video helped me clear HTET. Don't doubt sir; watch all his videos, and the exam will clear easily. Trust one teacher; wandering around won't help.”
1 likes
“Sir, my HTET paper passed because of your class. Thanks, sir.”
1 likes
“Sir, I took your batch, and I cleared HTET TGT Maths. Thank you so much, sir.”
1 likes
“Sir, please keep bringing such questions that build our confidence.”
1 likes
“Thank you so much, sir, for these lovely classes. The level of questions is mind-blowing.”
1 likes
“No sir, I had no problem in the first class. Just keep teaching; you teach very well.”
1 likes
“I watched all the computer videos, sir. It helped a lot. Thank you, sir.”
1 likes
“Thank you very much, sir. I learned math from you. I used to be scared of computers, but now I'll manage because you teach in a very easy way, and I remember it.”
1 likes
What could be better
“Last paper, my math scores were low, and I failed the paper.”
“In question number 35, you subtracted 1917 from 1352, but you should have subtracted 1352 from 1917.”