RZI-(B.Ed,CTET)-Team

CTET

2.1

Poor

12 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 12 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's flexibility, teacher's experience, doubt support. Many students highlight teacher's name implies relevant qualifications (b.ed, ctet)....

What students talk about most

Flexibility

There are no direct comments from students regarding the teacher's flexibility in terms of schedulin...

Teacher's Experience

While the teacher's qualifications (B.Ed, CTET) are mentioned, student comments raise serious doubts...

Doubt Support

Students frequently ask clarifying questions, indicating a need for doubt support. However, there's ...

Teaching Quality

There are no direct comments praising the teacher's instructional methods or clarity. The lack of po...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

Accusations of lying about preparation months indirectly impact perceived teaching quality.

Teacher's Experience2.5

Teacher's name implies relevant qualifications (B.Ed, CTET).

Accusations of lying and inconsistency undermine trust in their expertise and guidance.

Study Material2.0

No direct mention of study material, but misleading information on timelines suggests a lack of proper guidance for study planning.

Doubt Support2.5

Students actively ask clarifying questions, indicating a need for support.

No evidence of effective resolution of doubts.

Overall sentiment of misinformation raises concerns about reliability of support.

Tests & Practice1.5

Accusations of lying about 'preparation months' directly impact effective test preparation and practice.

Flexibility3.0

Fees vs Value2.0

Inconsistent information ('telling 150 earlier') could relate to fees or perceived value.

Lack of support for administrative tasks like scholarship forms ('couldn't even fill out') impacts perceived value.

Teacher Personality1.0

Students use polite greetings ('Good morning sir/sir ji').

Repeated and liked accusations of 'why are you lying?' severely damage the teacher's integrity and personality.

Top Strengths

1. Information Dissemination (providing news/updates)

2. Approachability for Student Queries

3. Basic Professional Demeanor (students address respectfully)

Areas to Improve

1. Truthfulness and Consistency of Information

2. Guidance on Preparation Timelines

3. Administrative Support for Students

What students love

“Thanks for giving the news.”

“Good morning sir.”

“Good morning sir ji.”

“Thanksgiving.”

“My first comment.”

1 likes

“Sir, is this for BA+B.Ed? Please reply.”

2 likes

“Sir, is there a class in English medium?”

1 likes

“Sir, how much scholarship do we get in a 2-year B.Ed?”

1 likes

“Will the 1-year B.Ed start or not?”

2 likes

“Sir, is this for BA+B.Ed? Please reply.”

2 likes

What could be better

“Sir, April and May are the preparation months, why are you lying?”

4 likes

“Sir, April and May are the preparation months, why are you lying?”

4 likes

“You were telling 150 earlier.”

“I couldn't even fill out the scholarship form.”

Had a class with RZI-(B.Ed,CTET)-Team?