Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
SAMSKRITHI

SAMSKRITHI

UGC NET
4.1
Great

42 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 42 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher's experience, teacher personality, teaching quality. Many students highlight demonstrated success in guiding students to quali...

What students talk about most

Teacher's Experience

The teacher possesses significant experience in NET preparation, evidenced by a strong track record ...

Teacher Personality

The teacher exhibits an excellent personality, consistently described as patient and kind, fostering...

Teaching Quality

The teaching is highly effective for many students, leading to successful NET qualifications and imp...

Doubt Support

Doubt support is a strong point, characterized by patience and kindness, making students feel comfor...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.0
Many students qualified NET and achieved significant additional marks (e.g., 8 marks in History, 4 marks in Commerce).
Successfully helped students who previously missed the NET cut-off to qualify.
Some students experienced no change in marks despite expectations for revised answer keys (e.g., Economics, Hindi).
Confusion and disappointment regarding how marks for dropped questions were (or were not) added to scorecards.
Teacher's Experience4.5
Demonstrated success in guiding students to qualify NET across multiple subjects (History, Commerce).
Students trust the teacher's expertise, requesting new courses in other subjects like Malayalam and Philosophy.
Study Material3.5
Implied effectiveness as students are consistently qualifying and improving their scores.
No direct comments on study material quality, but issues with answer key discrepancies might suggest areas for improvement in material accuracy or guidance related to potential exam body errors.
Doubt Support4.0
Students praise the teacher for patiently explaining things and behaving kindly during calls.
Students feel comfortable asking for guidance on application processes and new course details, indicating an approachable support system.
One student's query about unchanged marks after dropped questions suggests a need for clearer or more proactive guidance in complex post-result scenarios.
Tests & Practice3.5
Implied effectiveness through students achieving additional marks and qualifying, suggesting practice aligns well with the exam.
No direct comments on tests or practice, but the negative feedback regarding unexpected answer key changes could suggest that practice tests might not fully prepare students for the nuances of NTA's revision process.
Flexibility3.0
Students are actively requesting new courses (Malayalam, Philosophy), indicating a perceived potential for the teacher/platform to expand offerings.
No direct comments on operational flexibility regarding scheduling, learning modes, or course adjustments.
Fees vs Value4.0
Many students qualified NET and achieved significant additional marks, directly linking the coaching to a positive outcome and clear value for money.
Students who previously missed NET found value in reaching the cut-off and qualifying.
Students who saw 'no change' in their results despite expectations felt 'unfair' and 'very down,' implying a lack of value for their investment in those specific cases.
Teacher Personality4.5
Directly praised for patiently explaining things and behaving kindly during interactions with students.

Top Strengths

1. Highly effective in helping students qualify NET and improve scores across multiple subjects.

2. Provides strong, patient, and kind doubt support.

3. Possesses proven expertise, leading to student trust and demand for new courses.

Areas to Improve

1. Enhance clarity and accuracy regarding answer key revisions and mark calculation for dropped questions.

2. Consider expanding subject offerings to meet expressed student demand (e.g., Malayalam, Philosophy).

3. Provide more explicit information or support regarding complex exam system changes and their impact on results.

What students love

I am History NET qualified, and I got 8 additional marks. Thank you!

7 likes

I am from Commerce. I got 4 additional marks. I just missed NET earlier, but now I've reached the cut-off and qualified!

4 likes

Thank you for patiently explaining things and behaving kindly every time I called.

3 likes

In Commerce, I got 4 more marks and qualified for NET.

3 likes

I have qualified NET. Sir, can you tell me when I can apply for NFOBC in this cycle?

1 likes

Sir, I am already NET qualified in Commerce. I got 2 additional marks.

1 likes

I got 4 more marks in Commerce.

1 likes

I am NET qualified. Can I apply for this exam while pursuing my PG?

Sir, when will the Assistant Professor Malayalam course start?

5 likes

Sir, can you please tell me about Philosophy in detail?

1 likes

What could be better

For Economics, no change because the answer key was the same. I thought 3 sure wrong questions would change, but the revised final answer key is the same. This is unfair; I expected a lot. I missed NET by 2 marks and feel very down now.

2 likes

Sir, I am already NET qualified in Commerce. I answered all questions, but the 4 dropped marks haven't increased. No change in result.

2 likes

I can't check the result.

2 likes

Sir, the marks for 3 dropped questions are not added to my scorecard. My old result had 174 in History, and it's still 174. Can anything be done?

1 likes

The 3 questions I got wrong were dropped, but my marks haven't increased on the scorecard.

1 likes

How pathetic this system is! They conducted an exam, found irregularities, and canceled it. Now, two months after publishing results, they re-publish the answer key and results. Covering the NET syllabus is a huge effort; those taking coaching suffer financially. After all that, when you're relieved to have qualified, you have to re-check if your qualification is still valid. My God!

1 likes

When the Hindi revised answer key came, there was no change, and no changes in the result either.

1 likes

Had a class with SAMSKRITHI?