Sarat Chandra Judicial Academy

CLAT

2.5

Poor

12 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 12 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, fees vs value, teacher personality. Many students highlight students find videos and lectures good and useful for ju...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Students generally appreciate the quality of the lectures and find them useful, though there's an in...

Fees vs Value

While some perceive potential, there's no direct feedback on the fee structure or its value. Operati...

Teacher Personality

There are no direct comments on the teacher's personality, but student interactions appear respectfu...

Study Material

Students are actively seeking specific study materials and clear information on exam patterns and la...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality3.5

Students find videos and lectures good and useful for judicial aspirants.

One student inquired if classes explain from basics, suggesting a potential need for clarity on foundational teaching.

Teacher's Experience2.0

Students express a concern about the lack of clarity regarding faculty background.

Study Material2.5

Students are requesting subject books for specific exams and information on exam patterns and question paper language.

Doubt Support1.0

Multiple students report that the provided contact number is not reachable or working, making it impossible to get information or support.

Tests & Practice2.5

Students are asking for information on exam patterns and the language of question papers, suggesting a lack of clear communication on practice resources.

Flexibility2.5

Students are asking basic logistical questions about hostel fees and batch start dates, indicating information is not readily available or clear.

Fees vs Value3.0

One student finds the academy 'promising for judicial aspirants'.

No direct feedback on fees or value, but operational issues (contact, information) could negatively impact perceived value.

Teacher Personality3.0

Students use respectful language ('sir') in their inquiries.

Top Strengths

1. Perceived usefulness of video lectures

2. Quality of lectures

3. Positive initial impression for some aspirants

Areas to Improve

1. Reliability of contact information and communication channels

2. Transparency regarding faculty background and credentials

3. Provision of comprehensive study materials and exam pattern clarity

What students love

“Good video. Useful for jcj aspirants sir.”

1 likes

“Good lecture.”

“Sir, we need subject books for TS JCJ exam.”

1 likes

“Respected sir, do the classes explain from the basics, or should one have completed LLB?”

1 likes

“Sir, can I call you for information?”

“Please tell us the pattern.”

“CLAT exam preparation online class by Chapthara sir.”

1 likes

“Hostel fee? And when does the batch start?”

“Question paper, will it be in Telugu, sir? Please.”

“This academy seems promising for judicial aspirants.”

What could be better

“Your number is not reachable when I call.”

“Sir, your contact number is not working.”

“I'm having trouble reaching you by phone.”

“The contact information provided is not reliable.”

“It's frustrating when contact numbers don't work.”

“Lack of clarity on faculty background is a concern.”

Had a class with Sarat Chandra Judicial Academy?