Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Shivam Study Knowledge

Shivam Study Knowledge

Board ExamsPedagogyGeography
3.2
Average

63 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 63 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's fees vs value, teacher personality, study material. Many students highlight students express "great hope" and appreciation ("thank you...

What students talk about most

Fees vs Value

Students perceive high potential value in the teacher's content for board exam preparation, expressi...

Teacher Personality

The teacher is perceived as approachable and respected by students, who frequently express gratitude...

Study Material

There is high demand for the teacher's study materials, particularly model papers and important ques...

Tests & Practice

The teacher provides practice material like model papers, which students highly value for board exam...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0
"Nice class sir."
"Very good."
Students express hope that the content will appear in exams, implying perceived relevance.
Multiple comments about wrong answers (Q6, Q15, Q34, "one question wrong", "All MCQs are wrong", "your answer is wrong").
Teacher's Experience2.5
Students ask for "important questions," suggesting they trust the teacher's judgment on exam relevance.
Teacher is providing content for "Board Exams."
The numerous factual errors suggest a lack of thoroughness or expertise in certain areas, which contradicts the idea of deep experience.
Study Material3.0
Students are asking for "model papers," "important questions," and "PDF form" of questions, indicating a demand for the material provided.
The initial comment suggests the material is highly anticipated for board exams.
One student explicitly asks for PDFs of questions "you explain in the description," implying the current format might not be ideal for revision.
The core issue of accuracy of the material (wrong answers) is a major con.
Doubt Support2.0
Students are actively pointing out errors, implying they expect the teacher to acknowledge and correct them, which is a form of indirect interaction.
No direct comments about the teacher providing one-on-one doubt clarification or responding to specific questions beyond the content itself.
The teacher's response to the identified errors is not visible.
Tests & Practice3.0
Students are actively requesting "more model papers" and hoping the provided "paper came in the board exam," indicating the teacher is offering practice-oriented content relevant to board exams.
The numerous identified errors in questions (MCQs, Q6, Q15, Q34) make the practice material unreliable and potentially misleading for students preparing for exams.
Flexibility3.0
Students are requesting specific content ("Class 12th Sanskrit paper"), implying the teacher might be responsive to student needs or that the platform allows for such requests.
No information about scheduling, pace, or alternative teaching methods.
Fees vs Value3.5
Students express "great hope" and appreciation ("Thank you sir ji," "Thank you so much sir"), suggesting they perceive value in the content, especially if it helps with board exams.
The content seems to be freely available (implied by "description in PDF form").
The significant number of factual errors diminishes the actual value, as incorrect information can be detrimental to exam preparation.
Teacher Personality3.5
Students use respectful terms like "Sir" and "Sir ji," and express gratitude, indicating a generally positive and respectful relationship.
The teacher seems approachable enough for students to make requests and point out errors.
No direct comments on personality traits like enthusiasm, patience, or clarity of explanation.
The lack of visible response to error corrections might be seen negatively.

Top Strengths

1. High demand for content and model papers

2. Perceived relevance for board exams

3. Approachable and respected by students

Areas to Improve

1. Accuracy of answers and content

2. Provision of study material in accessible formats (PDF)

3. Direct doubt support and error correction mechanism

What students love

“Sir, I am studying from you with great hope. It would be great if this entire paper came in the board exam; it would be so much fun to take the exam.”

5 likes

“Sir, please bring the Class 12th Sanskrit paper (303(BR)).”

5 likes

“Sir, please bring more model papers. Thank you sir ji.”

2 likes

“Thanks sir ji.”

2 likes

“Thank you sir.”

1 likes

“Very good.”

1 likes

“Nice class sir.”

1 likes

“Sir, please provide the paper for all the questions you explain in the description in PDF form, so everyone can revise them again.”

1 likes

“Sir, please tell us the important questions.”

1 likes

“Thank you so much sir.”

What could be better

“Sir, the answer to question no. 6 is wrong. (Primary education was provided in Maktabs and higher education in Madrasas.)”

1 likes

“The answer to question number 15 you gave is wrong. The correct answer is option 'A' - Wardha Education Scheme.”

“Question number 6 is wrong, sir. In the book, option 1 is correct.”

“Sir, you have told one question wrong.”

“All MCQs are wrong.”

“Question number 6's answer is wrong.”

“Number 34 is wrong, answer (b) is correct.”

“Sir, your answer is wrong.”

Had a class with Shivam Study Knowledge?