SID and SANGAM

JEE

1.5

Bad

24 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 24 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, teacher personality. Many students highlight "really helpful", "great video👍", "much needed ❤...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

While some students find the content helpful and engaging, a significant concern is raised about the...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher appears to have some connections and can attract guests, but the factual error regarding...

Teacher Personality

While the teacher appears approachable to some students, the severe issues with customer service and...

Study Material

While there's a demand for additional resources, the severe complaint about inaccessible purchased c...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

"Really helpful"

"Great Video👍"

"Much needed ❤️"

"The information provided in the video appears to be inaccurate, as OpenText does not conduct an aptitude round."

Teacher's Experience2.0

Requests for specific domain alumni/seniors suggest the teacher is a source of connections or insights.

The inaccuracy comment directly questions the teacher's up-to-date industry knowledge regarding recruitment processes.

Study Material1.5

Students request supplementary materials like projects and resumes, indicating a perceived value in such resources.

The "scam" complaint implies that purchased course material might be inaccessible, rendering any material useless.

Doubt Support1.0

"the person who sold me this course is not receiving any calls. Even the customer care number is not reachable."

Tests & Practice1.5

The "inaccurate information" about company assessment rounds directly impacts the effectiveness of any guidance for tests and practice.

Flexibility1.0

The inability to reach customer care or the course seller indicates a complete lack of responsiveness and flexibility.

Fees vs Value1.0

"Scam scam scam. I've purchased a course and the person who sold me this course is not receiving any calls."

Teacher Personality2.0

Students use informal and friendly terms ("bro," "bhaiyya"), suggesting an approachable and relatable demeanor.

The serious complaints about unreachability and potential scamming severely undermine trust, integrity, and professionalism.

Top Strengths

1. Approachability (based on informal student greetings)

2. Content Relevance (potential to attract guests/alumni)

3. Limited Positive Engagement (some general praise)

Areas to Improve

1. Information Accuracy (critical for exam preparation)

2. Customer Support & Accessibility (severe unreachability issues)

3. Course Delivery & Value (accusations of scamming and inaccessible courses)

What students love

“Thanks bro. Really helpful. Would be great if you bring current seniors or Alumni from Embedded Sys or VLSI domain.”

“Keep making videos bhaiyya, I will meet you this year getting admission into KTR.”

“Much needed ❤️”

“Great Video👍”

1 likes

“Thank you for having me ❤️”

1 likes

“Bro plz do with CSE students too.”

“Can you share her projects please ???”

2 likes

“Sir I need the helpline number of One Stop AI, can I get it?”

1 likes

“Hi, I'm in my third year of study, can I have Jeol's two resumes for my reference?”

“Hi bro, please ask the guest to disclose these company's average annual salary.”

What could be better

“The information provided in the video appears to be inaccurate, as OpenText does not conduct an aptitude round. Instead, the company typically administers a single one-hour coding assessment.”

9 likes

“Scam scam scam. I've purchased a course and the person who sold me this course is not receiving any calls. Even the customer care number is not reachable.”

6 likes

Had a class with SID and SANGAM?