Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Sir Khalil Ahmed Joiya

Sir Khalil Ahmed Joiya

Science
2.7
Poor

10 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 10 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teacher personality, teaching quality, study material. Many students highlight students are 'big fans', appreciated 'nice urdu', gener...

What students talk about most

Teacher Personality

Sir Khalil appears to have a positive and engaging personality, with students expressing admiration ...

Teaching Quality

While there are no direct complaints about teaching quality, specific positive feedback is limited, ...

Study Material

No specific feedback was provided regarding the quality or availability of study materials.

Doubt Support

There is no specific feedback available concerning the teacher's support for student doubts.

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality3.5
Students learned commentary
Appreciated 'Nice Urdu'
General positive feedback (implied by 'Good!', 'Nice!')
Teacher's Experience2.0
General positive sentiment and appreciation
Disappointment with low marks despite effort
Perceived unfairness in paper checking
Concerns over result discrepancies and changes
Study Material2.7
Doubt Support2.7
Tests & Practice1.5
Unfair paper checking
Low marks despite hard work
Discrepancy between school-based assessments and PECTA results
Results uploaded too quickly, doubting thoroughness
Sudden changes in marks after checking
Suspicion of AI marking
Inconsistent grading system
Flexibility2.7
Fees vs Value2.7
Teacher Personality4.0
Students are 'big fans'
Appreciated 'Nice Urdu'
General positive emojis and expressions of liking

Top Strengths

1. Positive personality and student rapport

2. Engaging communication style (e.g., 'Nice Urdu')

3. General appreciation from some students

Areas to Improve

1. Fairness and transparency in paper checking and assessment

2. Consistency and accuracy of result processing

3. Addressing discrepancies between school-based assessments and final results

What students love

Sir, big fan! Nice Urdu. I read in 9th class, sir, I learned commentary from you.

Good!

Okay!

1 likes

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😮😮😮😮😮😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

1 likes

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

1 likes

👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

1 likes

Good!

Nice!

Great!

Excellent!

What could be better

Children have been wronged in paper checking. When these SBA papers were taken in schools, good students scored 99 marks, but PECTA gave 77. It seems like AI marking happened.

2 likes

I worked so hard but got such low marks. They were checking papers this morning, but they checked them so quickly and uploaded the result by 3 PM.

1 likes

I think I passed with 136/400, but they also passed those with grade E who had 110-125 marks. When I checked my result at 5 PM, I had 264 marks, then at 10 PM, it changed to 269.

The paper checking was unfair; many students who deserved higher marks received very low scores.

The results were uploaded too quickly, making me doubt the thoroughness of the checking process.

There's a discrepancy between school-based assessments and the PECTA results, which is concerning.

The sudden change in marks after checking the result multiple times indicates an issue with the system.

It feels like the marking was automated and didn't properly evaluate the students' efforts.

Many students are disappointed with their marks despite putting in a lot of effort.

The grading system seems inconsistent, as students with similar scores received different grades.

Had a class with Sir Khalil Ahmed Joiya?