Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
SOE 9 & 10

SOE 9 & 10

Board ExamsScienceMathematics
2.9
Poor

26 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 26 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, study material, teacher personality. Many students highlight it was very good, many questions were common, 22 marks ...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Students generally find the teaching effective and appreciate that many questions from classes or su...

Study Material

The study materials and suggestions are often highly effective, leading to common questions in exams...

Teacher Personality

Students generally express gratitude, indicating a positive rapport, though comments do not provide ...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher demonstrates good subject matter expertise and understanding of exam patterns, but opera...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.0
It was very good
many questions were common
22 marks were common in math
The question pattern is wrong
Teacher's Experience3.0
Implied by the high number of common questions, suggesting strong subject and exam pattern knowledge.
Significant issues with timing of suggestions ('after the exam') indicate a lack of practical experience in course delivery or student needs.
Study Material3.5
many questions were common
22 marks were common in math
The question pattern is wrong
Doubt Support3.0
Tests & Practice2.0
many questions were common
22 marks were common in math
Suggestions being given 'after the exam'
Suggestions for exams that are 'over'
Flexibility2.0
Students express a desire for more classes ('please keep giving classes for class nine').
Consistent complaints about providing materials after exams indicate a significant lack of flexibility or responsiveness to student exam schedules.
Fees vs Value2.5
The high number of common questions suggests strong potential value from the content itself.
The severe timing issues drastically reduce the actual value students receive, as they cannot utilize the materials for their intended purpose.
Teacher Personality3.5
Students express gratitude ('Thank you so much mam/sir'), suggesting a generally positive and appreciative interaction.

Top Strengths

1. Effectiveness of content (common questions in exams)

2. Strong subject matter expertise

3. Student appreciation for the content when timely

Areas to Improve

1. Timing and scheduling of materials/suggestions

2. Responsiveness to student exam schedules

3. Accuracy of question patterns in some materials

What students love

“It was very good, please keep giving classes for class nine.”

2 likes

“Thank you so much mam.”

1 likes

“Thank you, many questions were common.”

“Life science will be great.”

“Class nine.”

“It was very good sir, please keep giving classes for class nine.”

“Sir, 22 marks were common in math.”

“Thank you so much.”

“Mam, many questions were common.”

“Thank you so much mam.”

What could be better

“Mam, life science just happened today, and you are giving life science suggestions today?”

2 likes

“Sir, please do the 2nd Summative ones. The 1st Summative is over!”

1 likes

“Sir, why are you giving this after the exam?”

“Sir, our exam is over.”

“The question pattern is wrong.”

Had a class with SOE 9 & 10?