STUDENT OF RWA

SSC

2.6

Poor

56 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 56 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's tests & practice, doubt support, flexibility. Many students highlight one student explicitly mentions improving significantly in a 'mo...

What students talk about most

Tests & Practice

Students report significant score improvements in mock tests, indicating that the practice provided ...

Doubt Support

There is no direct feedback in the comments regarding the teacher's availability or effectiveness in...

Flexibility

The provided comments do not offer any insights into the teacher's flexibility regarding class sched...

Teacher Personality

While some students express gratitude and a respectful rapport, the severe accusation of misleading ...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.0

Students report achieving high scores in subjects like Maths and Reasoning (e.g., 'Maths 20, Reasoning 20', 'Total score is 142').

One student improved significantly in a mock test (from 115 to 134).

Serious accusation of 'copying old content' directly undermines the originality and quality of instruction.

Accusation of 'misleading people' points to poor teaching ethics.

Teacher's Experience2.0

The ability to guide students to high scores in competitive exams implies a certain level of expertise and understanding of the exam pattern.

The comment 'copying old content' suggests a potential lack of fresh perspective or updated knowledge.

The question 'Who are you?' implies a lack of established reputation or recognition.

Study Material1.0

The most direct negative comment is 'copying old content,' which severely criticizes the originality and potential relevance of the study material.

Doubt Support3.0

Tests & Practice3.5

One student explicitly mentions improving significantly in a 'mock test' (from 115 to 134), suggesting beneficial practice materials.

If the content is 'copied old content,' the practice questions or mock tests might also suffer from the same issue, potentially not reflecting the latest exam patterns.

Flexibility3.0

Fees vs Value2.0

Students achieving high scores and showing significant improvement suggest that for some, the teaching provides good value, leading to tangible results.

The accusation of 'misleading people by copying old content' implies that the value proposition is questionable, as students might be paying for unoriginal or outdated material.

Teacher Personality2.5

Students use terms like 'brother,' 'sir,' and express gratitude, indicating a generally positive and respectful rapport with some students.

The aggressive negative comment ('Who are you? Why are you misleading people by copying old content? 😡😡') suggests a significant breach of trust and frustration from other students.

Top Strengths

1. Helping some students achieve high scores in competitive exams (SSC).

2. Effectiveness in specific subjects like Maths and Reasoning.

3. Providing beneficial mock tests for performance tracking and improvement.

Areas to Improve

1. Addressing accusations of copying old content and ensuring originality.

2. Building trust and transparency with students regarding content sourcing.

3. Improving overall perceived integrity and ethical standards.

What students love

“144.25 UP OBC General area.”

1 likes

“Thank you, brother.”

1 likes

“Reasoning 20, Maths 20, G.S 12, Hindi 19. Total score is 142. 😊”

“126.5 from Jharkhand. ❤️”

“110.5 ❤️ From Gujarat.”

“Maths 20, Reasoning 20, Hindi 17✅ 3❎, Gk Gs 15✅ 5❎. Total 72✅ 8 ❎. Marks 142. OBC Category Bihar border district.”

“70 Questions ✅”

“Brother, today's mock test wasn't that hard. Earlier I scored 115, today I got 134. This week I studied 10 hours daily.”

“Thanks sir ❤️”

“Jai Shri Ram sir ❤️❤️❤️❤️”

What could be better

“Who are you? Why are you misleading people by copying old content? 😡😡”

8 likes

Had a class with STUDENT OF RWA?