Study Campus Classes

CTETSSC

1.3

Bad

25 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 25 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, teacher personality, teaching quality. Many students highlight students address 'sir' with various administrative and e...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

While students pose questions to 'Sir' about exam logistics, there is no evidence to evaluate the qu...

Teacher Personality

Students appear to view the teacher as an approachable authority figure for exam-related concerns, b...

Teaching Quality

There is no student feedback available to assess the teacher's teaching quality, making it impossibl...

Teacher's Experience

The provided comments do not offer any insight into the teacher's professional experience or depth o...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality1.0

No student comments provided that evaluate teaching methods, clarity, or effectiveness.

Teacher's Experience1.0

No student comments provided that refer to the teacher's experience, expertise, or subject mastery.

Study Material1.0

No student comments provided that mention or evaluate any study materials, booklets, or resources offered by the teacher.

Doubt Support2.0

Students address 'Sir' with various administrative and exam-related questions, suggesting they view the teacher as a point of contact for queries.

No feedback on whether these doubts were effectively addressed or if the teacher provides academic doubt resolution.

Tests & Practice1.0

No student comments provided that refer to practice tests, mock exams, or assessment strategies implemented by the teacher.

Flexibility1.0

No student comments provided that discuss the flexibility of class schedules, teaching approaches, or accommodation for student needs.

Fees vs Value1.0

No student comments provided that discuss the fee structure, perceived value for money, or return on investment for the classes.

Teacher Personality2.0

Students feel comfortable enough to address the teacher as 'Sir' and seek guidance on exam-related anxieties and administrative errors.

No direct feedback on the teacher's demeanor, motivational skills, or overall approachability beyond being a potential point of contact.

Top Strengths

1. Students perceive the teacher as a point of contact for exam-related administrative queries.

2. No explicit negative feedback from students (due to lack of relevant comments).

3. Potential for addressing student anxieties regarding exam procedures.

Areas to Improve

1. Lack of student feedback on teaching quality and effectiveness.

2. Absence of comments regarding study materials and practice tests.

3. No direct praise or evaluation of academic doubt support or teacher's expertise.

What students love

“Booklet series errors won't be a problem. Those who corrected them won't have issues. The same happened to me with EMRS, and I had no problems.”

“No, you will only not get marks for that specific question's answer.”

“My score is 39/39 in Group D. I mistakenly wrote 8/02/2026 instead of 8/03/2026 for the date, but the invigilator signed with the correct date. Will there be any problem, sir?”

“Sir, I wrote the venue code but didn't bubble it. Will there be any problem?”

“Sir, I wrote the Booklet Serial No. correctly but didn't bubble one box. Will my OMR sheet be canceled?”

“Sir, I wrote my OMR sheet roll number correctly but didn't mark one number. Will the result come?”

“Sir, I forgot to bubble one number in the booklet. Will the result be given?”

“I also mistakenly marked C first, my set was D. Later, I scratched out the C circle with my nail. Will the OMR be accepted?”

Had a class with Study Campus Classes?