Study for Judicial Services

Polity

3.2

Average

90 comments

5-star

4-star

3-star

2-star

1-star

Review summary

Based on 90 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, fees vs value. Many students highlight students understand everything and feel confident to pa...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

The teacher excels at making complex topics understandable and engaging, with many students praising...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher appears to have considerable experience, having taught for many years and across differe...

Fees vs Value

Students perceive high value, especially those who rely solely on the videos for exam preparation wi...

Study Material

The video content is generally perceived as comprehensive and time-saving, allowing students to prep...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality3.5

Students understand everything and feel confident to pass exams.

Teaching is described as amazing, detailed, interesting, and enjoyable.

Lessons are very helpful, time-saving, and have a good flow.

Significant factual inaccuracies (e.g., Para 220 (4) Class A, General Diary closing).

Lack of updated information or recall regarding recent legal changes (e.g., Murder sections).

Teacher's Experience3.5

Long-standing presence, with students watching since their college days.

Teaches multiple subjects (e.g., CPC classes), indicating broad legal knowledge.

Forgetting recent legal changes suggests a lapse in keeping knowledge current despite experience.

Study Material3.0

Videos are comprehensive enough for students to feel confident passing exams without additional resources.

Material is perceived as time-saving.

Critical factual inaccuracies within the content.

Technical issues such as missing audio or videos not opening.

Doubt Support2.5

Tests & Practice2.5

Flexibility3.0

Video format offers flexibility for self-paced learning and last-minute exam preparation.

Content is helpful even for short study periods (e.g., 5 days before exam).

Misleading practice of re-uploading old videos and presenting them as 'live'.

Fees vs Value3.5

High perceived value, especially for students without formal college education or Bare Acts.

Videos are seen as sufficient for exam success and time-saving.

Factual errors and technical issues could diminish the actual value despite initial positive perception.

Teacher Personality3.0

Described as engaging and interesting, making learning enjoyable.

General positive sentiment from students calling him a 'great teacher'.

Lack of transparency regarding video re-uploads could be seen as deceptive.

Top Strengths

1. Ability to make complex legal topics understandable and engaging.

2. Efficiency in delivering content, saving students valuable study time.

3. Perceived high value for self-learners, often replacing traditional resources.

Areas to Improve

1. Ensuring factual accuracy and consistently updating content with recent legal changes.

2. Improving transparency in content delivery, avoiding misleading practices like re-uploading old videos as live.

3. Addressing technical issues with video accessibility and audio quality to ensure reliable access.

What students love

“Sir, I've watched many videos for the AIBE exam, including yours. After watching your videos for two days, I understand everything. I never attended college or bought a Bare Act, but I feel confident I'll pass AIBE just by watching your videos. Thank you, Sir.”

3 likes

“Wow sir, you teach amazingly!”

2 likes

“Thank you so much for this video. I'm watching this 5 days before my AIBE 20 exam, and it's very helpful.”

1 likes

“I really enjoyed it, sir. It saved a lot of my time.”

1 likes

“Truly, brother, no one teaches with such detail and in such an interesting way. I enjoyed it a lot!”

1 likes

“Everything is understandable.”

“Sir, you teach very well.”

“You are a great teacher!”

“Sir, I've been watching you since my college days when you had your own channel. Your teaching flow is very good.”

“I am already attending your CPC classes; you are such a great teacher.”

What could be better

“Para 220 (4) Class A, Absonder is 30 years, not 3 years, and for Class B, 5 years is correct. Closing of General Diary is in para 297, not 295.”

6 likes

“Sir, you just re-uploaded an old video and showed it as live.”

2 likes

“Murder: It was 302 before, but what is it now? You didn't tell us, and you don't remember either. 101 BNS.”

“Sir, the voice is gone.”

“This video isn't even opening.”

Had a class with Study for Judicial Services?