Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Study with me

Study with me

CTETPedagogy
4.0
Great

21 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 21 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's teaching quality, teacher's experience, doubt support. Many students highlight generic 'thank you sir' comments suggest student satisf...

What students talk about most

Teaching Quality

Students express general gratitude, implying satisfaction with the teaching, but specific insights i...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher is perceived as knowledgeable and experienced in the CTET/Pedagogy domain, with students...

Doubt Support

Students are willing to engage with questions, implying an open channel for support, though the effe...

Fees vs Value

Students' interest in paid classes suggests they see potential value in the teacher's services, thou...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality4.0
Generic 'Thank you sir' comments suggest student satisfaction.
No specific comments detailing teaching methods, clarity, or effectiveness.
Teacher's Experience4.0
Students inquire about joining paid classes for specific exams (SSB TGT, JT), indicating perceived expertise.
Students ask about various exam schedules (OSSTET, OTET), suggesting the teacher is a trusted source for domain-specific information.
Study Material3.0
No comments directly address the quality, relevance, or availability of study materials.
Doubt Support4.0
Students feel comfortable asking a variety of questions, including administrative ones, suggesting an accessible environment.
No specific feedback on the quality, timeliness, or effectiveness of doubt resolution.
Tests & Practice3.0
Students are actively inquiring about exam dates, suggesting they are preparing for these exams, possibly with the teacher's guidance.
No direct comments on the teacher's provision of tests, quizzes, or practice materials.
Flexibility3.0
Interest in 'paid classes' suggests the availability of different learning options or formats.
No specific comments about scheduling, class timings, or adaptability to student needs.
Fees vs Value4.0
Students expressing interest in joining 'paid classes' implies a perceived value proposition for the teacher's offerings.
No direct comments on specific fees, affordability, or explicit value for money.
Teacher Personality4.0
Repeated 'Thank you sir' and respectful greetings ('Jay Jagannath sir 🙏') indicate a positive rapport.
Students feel comfortable asking administrative questions, suggesting an approachable demeanor.

Top Strengths

1. Positive student rapport and approachable personality

2. Perceived expertise and reliability for exam-related information

3. Accessibility for student inquiries and general support

Areas to Improve

1. Lack of specific feedback on teaching quality and methods

2. No explicit comments on study material or tests/practice provided

3. Addressing student anxieties about external exam delays (even if not directly the teacher's fault)

What students love

“Thank you sir.”

1 likes

“Thank you sir ❤️❤️”

1 likes

“Jay Jagannath sir 🙏”

1 likes

“Thank you sir.”

1 likes

“I want to join paid classes for SSB TGT and JT. How can I join?”

1 likes

“When will the OSSTET certificate arrive?”

1 likes

“When will the OTET 25-26 certificate arrive?”

“When will the SSB TGT exam be held?”

“The 2025 OTET certificate has already arrived.”

“When will the next OSSTET be held?”

1 likes

What could be better

“Whatever is coming, let it come quickly. Otherwise, the code of conduct will be implemented, and there will be no exam.”

4 likes

“Whatever is coming, let it come. We need the post. If this continues, the government will get more chances to delay.”

4 likes

Had a class with Study with me?