Teacher Mirrorteachermirror
Target Study IQ

Target Study IQ

SSC
2.1
Poor

89 comments

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Review summary

Based on 89 comments, created with AI

Students overwhelmingly praise this teacher's doubt support, tests & practice, teaching quality. Many students highlight one student achieved a high percentile, which might imply e...

What students talk about most

Doubt Support

There is no specific feedback provided in the comments regarding the teacher's doubt support.

Tests & Practice

While a high percentile suggests successful preparation, there is no explicit feedback on the availa...

Teaching Quality

While some students appreciate the teaching style and achieve good results, there's significant diss...

Teacher's Experience

The teacher's expertise is questioned regarding cutoff predictions and understanding of the student ...

Evaluation breakdown

Teaching Quality2.5
Some students praise the teaching style as 'very excellent' and report high percentile scores (97.1%).
Students complain about repetitive content ('watched this video 6 times already', 'same video')
Accusations of talking 'a lot of nonsense' instead of teaching.
Teacher's Experience2.0
A student reported a high percentile, suggesting effective guidance for some.
The teacher's predictions and understanding of student demographics are heavily criticized ('How can you predict the cutoff when you don't know...', 'Hey fool, are all 90%+ scorers graduates?').
Accusations of changing competition and syllabus through statements.
Study Material1.5
Some content is noted as relevant for specific exams ('This topic is relevant for the AD Nursing exam.').
A severe complaint states that paid batch content and PDFs are given away for free on YouTube, leading to accusations of cheating and demands for refunds.
Doubt Support3.0
Tests & Practice3.0
One student achieved a high percentile, which might imply effective preparation through practice.
Flexibility1.5
Students repeatedly complain about the lack of new content and the recycling of old videos ('bring new classes', 'same video').
Fees vs Value1.0
One student expressed interest in another paid batch, suggesting perceived value in some offerings.
Students who paid for batches feel cheated because the same 'expensive' content and PDFs are later provided for free on YouTube, leading to demands for refunds.
Teacher Personality2.0
Some students address the teacher respectfully ('Pranam sir', 'Namaste sir ji') and express trust or call them 'best teacher'.
Students criticize the teacher for talking 'a lot of nonsense' and making irresponsible statements.
The teacher's communication style or content provokes strong negative reactions, including direct insults from students ('Hey fool').

Top Strengths

1. Ability to help some students achieve high scores (e.g., 97.1% percentile).

2. Perceived relevance of some topics for specific exams.

3. Some students find the teaching style excellent.

Areas to Improve

1. Content freshness and variety to avoid repetition.

2. Ethical handling of paid versus free content to maintain trust and value.

3. Accuracy and common sense in predictions and advice.

4. Reducing irrelevant talking during classes to focus on core teaching.

What students love

Sir, I want to take the HEO batch.

3 likes

My percentile is 97.1%.

1 likes

This topic is relevant for the AD Nursing exam.

1 likes

Pranam sir.

Good evening sir.

Namaste sir ji.

ICDS Yojana started on Oct 2, 1975.

You are the best teacher, sir.

Sir, I am relying on you now.

Sir, your teaching style is very excellent.

What could be better

How can you predict the cutoff when you don't know how many of the 1.9 million students are intermediate or graduates?

4 likes

Sir, please teach new things. I have watched this video 6 times already.

2 likes

Sir, how many times will you give the same video? This is a January class; bring new classes.

2 likes

By speaking like this, sir, you have changed the competition and syllabus.

2 likes

Hey fool, are all 90%+ scorers graduates? Use some common sense. Only 50% are graduates, and not all have 12th-grade math and science.

1 likes

You teach less and talk a lot of nonsense.

All the content you teach on YouTube is from your paid batch. Are we fools who paid for the batch? Return our money. You gave such an expensive batch and then free PDFs to everyone on YouTube. You cheated us. Your channel should be shut down.

Had a class with Target Study IQ?